Tools & Wizards About Us
radiesthesia.online screenshot

Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

radiesthesia.online

Radiesthesia,online

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

27 ms

Resources Loaded

873 ms

Page Rendered

397 ms

radiesthesia.online screenshot

About Website

Visit radiesthesia.online now to see the best up-to-date Radiesthesia content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about radiesthesia.online

Where you'll find the right course to learn the many aspects of pendulum dowsing. Plus unique and essential products.

Visit radiesthesia.online

Key Findings

We analyzed Radiesthesia.online page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

radiesthesia.online performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.056

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

radiesthesia.online

27 ms

radiesthesia.online

164 ms

regular.css

68 ms

solid.css

79 ms

brands.css

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Radiesthesia.online, 54% (22 requests) were made to Images.leadconnectorhq.com and 15% (6 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (682 ms) relates to the external source Images.leadconnectorhq.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 369.6 kB (49%)

Content Size

757.1 kB

After Optimization

387.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Radiesthesia.online main page is 757.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 421.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 355.9 kB

  • Original 421.4 kB
  • After minification 382.5 kB
  • After compression 65.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 355.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 11.7 kB

  • Original 332.1 kB
  • After minification 320.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Radiesthesia images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 2.9 kB
  • After minification 931 B
  • After compression 885 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Radiesthesia.online needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (13%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Radiesthesia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

radiesthesia.online

radiesthesia.online

27 ms

radiesthesia.online

radiesthesia.online

164 ms

regular.css

regular.css

68 ms

solid.css

solid.css

79 ms

brands.css

brands.css

80 ms

element_animation.css

element_animation.css

57 ms

css

css

62 ms

66b858f07eda5ce5f064ae48.jpeg

66b858f07eda5ce5f064ae48.jpeg

47 ms

6703c08f48d826d3e7af477b.jpeg

6703c08f48d826d3e7af477b.jpeg

92 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

25 ms

67036a101b48d607dc2a7ddb.jpeg

67036a101b48d607dc2a7ddb.jpeg

116 ms

670660f44f1479786ed5f7f2.jpeg

670660f44f1479786ed5f7f2.jpeg

110 ms

66fcdc76b27ab03aa1c8ca59.jpeg

66fcdc76b27ab03aa1c8ca59.jpeg

130 ms

6705dbb87b2dd5d01a90fbc1.jpeg

6705dbb87b2dd5d01a90fbc1.jpeg

120 ms

67047c9b623d9f5a64463cf6.jpeg

67047c9b623d9f5a64463cf6.jpeg

124 ms

6706650e7b2dd50a5b91bafc.jpeg

6706650e7b2dd50a5b91bafc.jpeg

132 ms

670485a5e57d0958647bbf44.jpeg

670485a5e57d0958647bbf44.jpeg

143 ms

67049d34ec8935d4a6e8a4cc.jpeg

67049d34ec8935d4a6e8a4cc.jpeg

125 ms

66bb4c6b9f1905d53db76c9a.jpeg

66bb4c6b9f1905d53db76c9a.jpeg

682 ms

67066397748b316949c26cfa.png

67066397748b316949c26cfa.png

169 ms

66fcb01c0d8afb85ca3c1599.jpeg

66fcb01c0d8afb85ca3c1599.jpeg

161 ms

670667dc43fa964f285a75f6.png

670667dc43fa964f285a75f6.png

170 ms

66bb4dda3fbc1b79674887cf.jpeg

66bb4dda3fbc1b79674887cf.jpeg

171 ms

66fd28ef4a66d850d6b59599.png

66fd28ef4a66d850d6b59599.png

174 ms

67065b6c43fa9656bc5a6aa5.jpeg

67065b6c43fa9656bc5a6aa5.jpeg

189 ms

6704b9173394ecd2ad83627d.jpeg

6704b9173394ecd2ad83627d.jpeg

201 ms

6704db5aec8935a124e8d783.jpeg

6704db5aec8935a124e8d783.jpeg

220 ms

66b9a6beef788347f31e5461.jpeg

66b9a6beef788347f31e5461.jpeg

209 ms

66b9a7baef788302251e54a4.jpeg

66b9a7baef788302251e54a4.jpeg

217 ms

66b9a82d5bab2863b17d50a0.jpeg

66b9a82d5bab2863b17d50a0.jpeg

226 ms

payment-warning.dd3003de.svg

payment-warning.dd3003de.svg

14 ms

66f63f1b1d4c7a49fd19be8f.png

66f63f1b1d4c7a49fd19be8f.png

194 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

37 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

38 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

51 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

57 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

68 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

67 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

20 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

13 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

36 ms

Accessibility Review

radiesthesia.online accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

radiesthesia.online best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

radiesthesia.online SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radiesthesia.online can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Radiesthesia.online main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

radiesthesia.online

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Radiesthesia. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: