Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

radiofuturafm.net

Radio Futura

Page Load Speed

7.1 sec in total

First Response

3.5 sec

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

78 ms

radiofuturafm.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to radiofuturafm.net homepage info - get ready to check Radio Futura Fm best content right away, or after learning these important things about radiofuturafm.net

En Construcción

Visit radiofuturafm.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Radiofuturafm.net page load time and found that the first response time was 3.5 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

radiofuturafm.net performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value27.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,460 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.682

8/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

radiofuturafm.net

3464 ms

4bce82b4b9aad34744ca79a5170f6e76

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Radiofuturafm.net, 50% (1 request) were made to Np.lexity.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Radiofuturafm.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 28.1 kB (77%)

Content Size

36.6 kB

After Optimization

8.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Radiofuturafm.net main page is 36.6 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 35.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 276 B

  • Original 674 B
  • After minification 674 B
  • After compression 398 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 276 B or 41% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 27.9 kB

  • Original 35.9 kB
  • After minification 29.5 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Radio Futura Fm. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

radiofuturafm.net accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

radiofuturafm.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

radiofuturafm.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radiofuturafm.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Radiofuturafm.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Radio Futura Fm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: