Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

radiopolar.com

Radio Polar | Polar Comunicaciones | Región de Magallanes

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

698 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

radiopolar.com screenshot

About Website

Visit radiopolar.com now to see the best up-to-date Radio Polar content for Chile and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about radiopolar.com

Radio Polar de Polar Comunicaciones. Somos el medio de comunicación multiplataforma de la Patagonia Chileno-Argentina donde encontrarás noticias y actualidad.

Visit radiopolar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Radiopolar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 698 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

radiopolar.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.1 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

radiopolar.com

698 ms

styles.css

31 ms

contentslider.css

32 ms

mensup.css

34 ms

mensup.js

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 214 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (168 requests) were addressed to the original Radiopolar.com, 4% (8 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 3% (7 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (797 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.syndication.twimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 875.1 kB (37%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Radiopolar.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 122.4 kB

  • Original 143.2 kB
  • After minification 119.2 kB
  • After compression 20.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.9 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 91.3 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Radio Polar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 447.9 kB

  • Original 734.0 kB
  • After minification 728.5 kB
  • After compression 286.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 447.9 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 213.6 kB

  • Original 258.6 kB
  • After minification 256.1 kB
  • After compression 45.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Radiopolar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 213.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (22%)

Requests Now

208

After Optimization

163

The browser has sent 208 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Radio Polar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

radiopolar.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Best Practices

radiopolar.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

radiopolar.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radiopolar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Radiopolar.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Radio Polar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: