Tools & Wizards About Us
radioprotection.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 68

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

radioprotection.org

Radioprotection

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

347 ms

Resources Loaded

5.2 sec

Page Rendered

428 ms

radioprotection.org screenshot

About Website

Visit radioprotection.org now to see the best up-to-date Radioprotection content for Morocco and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about radioprotection.org

Radioprotection, theoretical calculation of doses - radioactive fallout - biological effects of ionising radiation or radiobiology - experimental studies (dosimetry, reactor physics, radiochemistry), ...

Visit radioprotection.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Radioprotection.org page load time and found that the first response time was 347 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

radioprotection.org performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.4 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,940 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.288

42/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.8 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

radioprotection.org

347 ms

www.radioprotection.org

3609 ms

jquery.multiselect.css

19 ms

jquery.qtip.min.css

35 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.css

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Radioprotection.org, 9% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Radioprotection.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 132.7 kB (21%)

Content Size

624.4 kB

After Optimization

491.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Radioprotection.org main page is 624.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 243.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 66.2 kB

  • Original 76.8 kB
  • After minification 58.6 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.2 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 51.9 kB

  • Original 207.1 kB
  • After minification 155.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Radioprotection needs image optimization as it can save up to 51.9 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

  • Original 243.2 kB
  • After minification 243.2 kB
  • After compression 233.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 97.3 kB
  • After minification 97.3 kB
  • After compression 92.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Radioprotection.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (63%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Radioprotection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

radioprotection.org

radioprotection.org

347 ms

www.radioprotection.org

www.radioprotection.org

3609 ms

jquery.multiselect.css

jquery.multiselect.css

19 ms

jquery.qtip.min.css

jquery.qtip.min.css

35 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.css

jquery.magnific-popup.css

48 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

118 ms

list_tab.css

list_tab.css

50 ms

mod_solr.css

mod_solr.css

49 ms

template.css

template.css

50 ms

jquery-3.1.0.min.js

jquery-3.1.0.min.js

139 ms

jquerynoconflict.js

jquerynoconflict.js

68 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

200 ms

jquery.multiselect.min.js

jquery.multiselect.min.js

68 ms

jquery.qtip.min.js

jquery.qtip.min.js

84 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

82 ms

js

js

64 ms

jquery.autocomplete.js

jquery.autocomplete.js

83 ms

css2

css2

35 ms

article.css

article.css

98 ms

cookie.css

cookie.css

98 ms

commun_v3.css

commun_v3.css

98 ms

template1.css

template1.css

113 ms

flags25.css

flags25.css

113 ms

radiopro.css

radiopro.css

114 ms

jquery.mmenu.all.css

jquery.mmenu.all.css

128 ms

jquery.mmenu.all.min.js

jquery.mmenu.all.min.js

130 ms

script.js

script.js

129 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

144 ms

common.js

common.js

144 ms

logo_edp_105.svg

logo_edp_105.svg

43 ms

en.gif

en.gif

41 ms

fr.gif

fr.gif

40 ms

logo_radiopro.png

logo_radiopro.png

45 ms

logo_sfrp.png

logo_sfrp.png

42 ms

s2o_logo_100.png

s2o_logo_100.png

41 ms

radiopro_cover.jpg

radiopro_cover.jpg

112 ms

RAD_2.jpg

RAD_2.jpg

45 ms

RAD_4.png

RAD_4.png

45 ms

120_90_en.gif

120_90_en.gif

46 ms

logo_edp_fff.svg

logo_edp_fff.svg

46 ms

4cj30Oslxz8

4cj30Oslxz8

163 ms

header_radiopro.jpg

header_radiopro.jpg

77 ms

font

font

97 ms

FontAwesome.otf

FontAwesome.otf

132 ms

ga.js

ga.js

24 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

29 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

23 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

20 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

11 ms

base.js

base.js

65 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

149 ms

otHsKJfjPd3_2FAmxNFjsC1JH5zSbWQCFckcgLAtX70.js

otHsKJfjPd3_2FAmxNFjsC1JH5zSbWQCFckcgLAtX70.js

98 ms

embed.js

embed.js

32 ms

id

id

14 ms

Accessibility Review

radioprotection.org accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

radioprotection.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

radioprotection.org SEO score

68

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radioprotection.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Radioprotection.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

radioprotection.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Radioprotection. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: