Tools & Wizards About Us
radonscaffolding.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

radonscaffolding.com

Index of /

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

13 ms

Resources Loaded

376 ms

Page Rendered

937 ms

radonscaffolding.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to radonscaffolding.com homepage info - get ready to check Radonscaffolding best content right away, or after learning these important things about radonscaffolding.com

Construction & building materials supplier of steel scaffolding tower, and aluminum ladders, at wholesale rates in Dubai, Sharjah, Abu Dhabi, Ajman, Fujairah, UAE.

Visit radonscaffolding.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Radonscaffolding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

radonscaffolding.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.519

15/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

radonscaffolding.com

13 ms

radonscaffolding.com

26 ms

xzoom.css

80 ms

style.css

10 ms

form.css

10 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Radonscaffolding.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (172 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 75.5 kB (4%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Radonscaffolding.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 33.7 kB

  • Original 38.1 kB
  • After minification 20.1 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.0 kB, which is 47% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.7 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.1 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Radonscaffolding images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 17.1 kB

  • Original 164.6 kB
  • After minification 164.5 kB
  • After compression 147.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 14.6 kB

  • Original 74.2 kB
  • After minification 74.2 kB
  • After compression 59.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Radonscaffolding.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.6 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (45%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Radonscaffolding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

radonscaffolding.com

radonscaffolding.com

13 ms

radonscaffolding.com

radonscaffolding.com

26 ms

xzoom.css

xzoom.css

80 ms

style.css

style.css

10 ms

form.css

form.css

10 ms

js1.js

js1.js

21 ms

jqery.min.js

jqery.min.js

21 ms

form.js

form.js

22 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

27 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

34 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

32 ms

roberto.bundle.js

roberto.bundle.js

37 ms

active.js

active.js

27 ms

css

css

56 ms

css

css

56 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

31 ms

animate.css

animate.css

27 ms

classy-nav.css

classy-nav.css

24 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

42 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

29 ms

nice-select.css

nice-select.css

45 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

42 ms

style.css

style.css

48 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.min.css

bootstrap-datepicker.min.css

50 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

45 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

105 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

172 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

95 ms

xfbml.customerchat.js

xfbml.customerchat.js

147 ms

logo.png

logo.png

15 ms

00.jpg

00.jpg

17 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

18 ms

straight_ladder01.jpg

straight_ladder01.jpg

16 ms

platform_steps01.jpg

platform_steps01.jpg

64 ms

access_scaffolding00.jpg

access_scaffolding00.jpg

16 ms

formwork00.jpg

formwork00.jpg

64 ms

formwork01.jpg

formwork01.jpg

65 ms

safetyharness00.jpg

safetyharness00.jpg

70 ms

safetyharness01.jpg

safetyharness01.jpg

64 ms

mobile_platform01.jpg

mobile_platform01.jpg

71 ms

mobile_platform00.jpg

mobile_platform00.jpg

69 ms

scaffold_boards00.jpg

scaffold_boards00.jpg

69 ms

scaffold_boards01.jpg

scaffold_boards01.jpg

66 ms

access_scaffolding01.jpg

access_scaffolding01.jpg

66 ms

archi.png

archi.png

74 ms

Artboard1.jpg

Artboard1.jpg

72 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

72 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

71 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

74 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

69 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

76 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

75 ms

footer.jpg

footer.jpg

77 ms

footer_logo.png

footer_logo.png

74 ms

Accessibility Review

radonscaffolding.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

radonscaffolding.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

radonscaffolding.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radonscaffolding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Radonscaffolding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

radonscaffolding.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Radonscaffolding. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: