Tools & Wizards About Us
radreviewmhe.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

radreviewmhe.com

RadReview: Improve ARRT Test Prep

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

38 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

494 ms

radreviewmhe.com screenshot

About Website

Visit radreviewmhe.com now to see the best up-to-date Rad Review Mhe content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about radreviewmhe.com

RadReview Test Prep offers the top Test and Exam preparation for the ARRT available today.

Visit radreviewmhe.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Radreviewmhe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 38 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

radreviewmhe.com performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

radreviewmhe.com

38 ms

radreviewmhe.com

126 ms

animate.css

109 ms

bootstrap.min.css

278 ms

font-awesome.min.css

112 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Radreviewmhe.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Radreviewmhe.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 469.8 kB (15%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Radreviewmhe.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 53.7 kB

  • Original 65.1 kB
  • After minification 51.3 kB
  • After compression 11.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.8 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 408.3 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rad Review Mhe needs image optimization as it can save up to 408.3 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 57.5 kB
  • After minification 57.5 kB
  • After compression 54.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 48.2 kB
  • After minification 48.2 kB
  • After compression 43.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Radreviewmhe.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (33%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

35

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rad Review Mhe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

radreviewmhe.com

radreviewmhe.com

38 ms

radreviewmhe.com

radreviewmhe.com

126 ms

animate.css

animate.css

109 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

278 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

112 ms

slick.css

slick.css

112 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

201 ms

style.css

style.css

214 ms

iphoneslider.css

iphoneslider.css

358 ms

ipadslider.css

ipadslider.css

385 ms

css

css

31 ms

custom.css

custom.css

359 ms

logo-radreview.png

logo-radreview.png

502 ms

logo-radreview-mobile.png

logo-radreview-mobile.png

283 ms

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Laptop-Screen-01.png

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Laptop-Screen-01.png

505 ms

thumb-video-saia.jpg

thumb-video-saia.jpg

502 ms

Play_Button.png

Play_Button.png

503 ms

iphone-x-1.png

iphone-x-1.png

506 ms

iphone-x-3.png

iphone-x-3.png

513 ms

iphone-x-2.png

iphone-x-2.png

608 ms

iphone-x-6.png

iphone-x-6.png

629 ms

iphone-x-7.png

iphone-x-7.png

641 ms

ipad-screenshot-for-institutional-tools.png

ipad-screenshot-for-institutional-tools.png

631 ms

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-DA_Saia-Thumb.jpg

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-DA_Saia-Thumb.jpg

626 ms

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Merryl_Fulmer-Thumb.jpg

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Merryl_Fulmer-Thumb.jpg

604 ms

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Craig_Shephard-Thumb.jpg

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Craig_Shephard-Thumb.jpg

727 ms

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-DA_Saia.jpg

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-DA_Saia.jpg

729 ms

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Merryl_Fulmer.jpg

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Merryl_Fulmer.jpg

788 ms

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Craig_Shephard.jpg

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Craig_Shephard.jpg

724 ms

jquery-2.1.3.min.js

jquery-2.1.3.min.js

790 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

729 ms

jquery.viewportchecker.js

jquery.viewportchecker.js

801 ms

iphoneslider.js

iphoneslider.js

902 ms

ipadslider.js

ipadslider.js

906 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

886 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

948 ms

scrolling-nav.js

scrolling-nav.js

943 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

961 ms

screens.png

screens.png

1005 ms

iOS.png

iOS.png

904 ms

play.png

play.png

906 ms

logo-mcgrawhill.png

logo-mcgrawhill.png

1034 ms

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Banner-01.jpg

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Banner-01.jpg

744 ms

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Banner-02.jpg

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Banner-02.jpg

768 ms

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Banner-03.jpg

2018_McGraw_Hill-RadReview-Banner-03.jpg

783 ms

iphone.png

iphone.png

764 ms

icon1a.png

icon1a.png

761 ms

icon2a.png

icon2a.png

854 ms

icon3a.png

icon3a.png

724 ms

icon4a.png

icon4a.png

773 ms

icon5a.png

icon5a.png

745 ms

icon6a.png

icon6a.png

768 ms

powered-by-logo.png

powered-by-logo.png

774 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

15 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

22 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

38 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

807 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

44 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

322 ms

Accessibility Review

radreviewmhe.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

radreviewmhe.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

radreviewmhe.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radreviewmhe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Radreviewmhe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

radreviewmhe.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rad Review Mhe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: