Tools & Wizards About Us
radroof.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

radroof.com

Roofing Contractors in San Antonio, Austin & Frisco, TX | Radiant Roofing

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

76 ms

Resources Loaded

5.5 sec

Page Rendered

337 ms

radroof.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to radroof.com homepage info - get ready to check Radroof best content right away, or after learning these important things about radroof.com

Time for a new roof? Call Radiant Roofing, with locations in San Antonio, Austin & Frisco, TX. Call for a free expert consultation today! Click for info.

Visit radroof.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Radroof.com page load time and found that the first response time was 76 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

radroof.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

radroof.com

76 ms

style.min.css

14 ms

theme.min.css

27 ms

header-footer.min.css

34 ms

frontend.min.css

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Radroof.com, 12% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (7 requests) were made to Tags.tiqcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (601 ms) relates to the external source Synchronybusiness.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 103.0 kB (16%)

Content Size

643.0 kB

After Optimization

540.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Radroof.com main page is 643.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 351.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 100.4 kB

  • Original 122.3 kB
  • After minification 118.3 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 351.6 kB
  • After minification 350.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Radroof images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 856 B

  • Original 137.5 kB
  • After minification 137.5 kB
  • After compression 136.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 604 B

  • Original 31.6 kB
  • After minification 31.6 kB
  • After compression 31.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Radroof.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (85%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Radroof. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

radroof.com

radroof.com

76 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

14 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

27 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

34 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

44 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

44 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

43 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

46 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

48 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

47 ms

widget-social-icons.min.css

widget-social-icons.min.css

54 ms

apple-webkit.min.css

apple-webkit.min.css

60 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

60 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

56 ms

popup.min.css

popup.min.css

57 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

60 ms

widget-call-to-action.min.css

widget-call-to-action.min.css

66 ms

post-29.css

post-29.css

68 ms

post-9.css

post-9.css

69 ms

post-17.css

post-17.css

71 ms

css

css

39 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

83 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

73 ms

js

js

73 ms

transitions.min.css

transitions.min.css

77 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

79 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

77 ms

swap.js

swap.js

36 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

125 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

126 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

125 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

126 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

126 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

129 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

129 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

131 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

130 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

55 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

79 ms

utag.js

utag.js

102 ms

20-05048-mcc-digitalassets_displayad_homespecialty-computer-300x250retina-f2.png

20-05048-mcc-digitalassets_displayad_homespecialty-computer-300x250retina-f2.png

601 ms

Radiant-Roofing-Logo-white-300x176.png

Radiant-Roofing-Logo-white-300x176.png

43 ms

DJI_0397.jpg

DJI_0397.jpg

100 ms

certainteed-300x300.png

certainteed-300x300.png

67 ms

TRI-LOGO-1-300x300.png

TRI-LOGO-1-300x300.png

65 ms

CT-RWB-text-300x88.png

CT-RWB-text-300x88.png

66 ms

utag.2.js

utag.2.js

84 ms

utag.3.js

utag.3.js

83 ms

utag.5.js

utag.5.js

97 ms

utag.6.js

utag.6.js

83 ms

utag.14.js

utag.14.js

81 ms

utag.16.js

utag.16.js

81 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

30 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

39 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

53 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

67 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

66 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

66 ms

tDbM2oWUg0MKoZw1-LPK9Q.woff

tDbM2oWUg0MKoZw1-LPK9Q.woff

67 ms

tDbD2oWUg0MKqScQ6w.woff

tDbD2oWUg0MKqScQ6w.woff

66 ms

up_loader.1.1.0.js

up_loader.1.1.0.js

33 ms

js

js

58 ms

generic

generic

11 ms

generic

generic

11 ms

pixel

pixel

26 ms

rubicon

rubicon

3 ms

rubicon

rubicon

3 ms

pixel

pixel

13 ms

google

google

3 ms

Accessibility Review

radroof.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

radroof.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

radroof.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radroof.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Radroof.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

radroof.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Radroof. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: