Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 58

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 25% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

radwag.net

Radwag Balances and Scales - analytical balance, moisture analyzer, radwag scales

Page Load Speed

9.1 sec in total

First Response

574 ms

Resources Loaded

7.9 sec

Page Rendered

618 ms

radwag.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to radwag.net homepage info - get ready to check Radwag best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about radwag.net

Radwag scales are modern weighing devices. Innovative interface, reliability, speed. Manufactured in the EU.

Visit radwag.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Radwag.net page load time and found that the first response time was 574 ms and then it took 8.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

radwag.net performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value91.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20,240 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value96.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

radwag.com

574 ms

1547 ms

gtm.js

140 ms

radwag.css

340 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

835 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Radwag.net, 10% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) relates to the external source Radwag.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 464.5 kB (2%)

Content Size

24.1 MB

After Optimization

23.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Radwag.net main page is 24.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 23.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 134.1 kB

  • Original 165.3 kB
  • After minification 163.3 kB
  • After compression 31.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 134.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 321.8 kB

  • Original 23.7 MB
  • After minification 23.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Radwag images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 170.4 kB
  • After minification 170.4 kB
  • After compression 164.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 47.9 kB
  • After minification 47.9 kB
  • After compression 45.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Radwag.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (59%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Radwag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

radwag.net accessibility score

58

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

radwag.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

radwag.net SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radwag.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Radwag.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Radwag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: