Tools & Wizards About Us
raepak.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

raepak.com

raepak.com - raepak Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

16.7 sec in total

First Response

501 ms

Resources Loaded

14.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

raepak.com screenshot

About Website

Visit raepak.com now to see the best up-to-date Raepak content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about raepak.com

raepak.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, raepak.com has it all. We hope you find what ...

Visit raepak.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Raepak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 501 ms and then it took 16.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

raepak.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,970 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

raepak.com

501 ms

www.raepak.com

5236 ms

reset-bootstrap.css

636 ms

style.css

471 ms

dashicons.min.css

798 ms

Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Raepak.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Raepak.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (51%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Raepak.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 902.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 55.3 kB

  • Original 69.2 kB
  • After minification 66.3 kB
  • After compression 13.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

  • Original 754.7 kB
  • After minification 741.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Raepak images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 350.2 kB

  • Original 586.9 kB
  • After minification 528.0 kB
  • After compression 236.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 350.2 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 755.1 kB

  • Original 902.0 kB
  • After minification 765.9 kB
  • After compression 146.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Raepak.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 755.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (74%)

Requests Now

98

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Raepak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

raepak.com

raepak.com

501 ms

www.raepak.com

www.raepak.com

5236 ms

reset-bootstrap.css

reset-bootstrap.css

636 ms

style.css

style.css

471 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

798 ms

thickbox.css

thickbox.css

449 ms

style.css

style.css

623 ms

flick.css

flick.css

1402 ms

www.raepak.com

www.raepak.com

2907 ms

css

css

93 ms

styles.css

styles.css

1269 ms

cli-style.css

cli-style.css

816 ms

public.min.css

public.min.css

1278 ms

style.css

style.css

1133 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

1833 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

1648 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

1476 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

1469 ms

style.css

style.css

1562 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

1613 ms

style.css

style.css

2678 ms

custom.css

custom.css

1672 ms

custom.css

custom.css

1906 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

2299 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1783 ms

flags.js

flags.js

1896 ms

scrollTo.js

scrollTo.js

1920 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

2166 ms

mailchimp.js

mailchimp.js

2025 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

2044 ms

datepicker.js

datepicker.js

2578 ms

cookielawinfo.js

cookielawinfo.js

2236 ms

css

css

63 ms

css

css

155 ms

css

css

156 ms

javascript.php

javascript.php

3015 ms

element.js

element.js

176 ms

thickbox.js

thickbox.js

2900 ms

jquery.commonlibraries.js

jquery.commonlibraries.js

2363 ms

jquery.layout.js

jquery.layout.js

2539 ms

jquery.custom.js

jquery.custom.js

2652 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

2696 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

2421 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

2553 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

2973 ms

jq-cookie.js

jq-cookie.js

2350 ms

cart-fragments.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

2381 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

2427 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

2294 ms

woocompare.js

woocompare.js

2052 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

2072 ms

responsive.js

responsive.js

2008 ms

twitter-text.js

twitter-text.js

2082 ms

jquery.cycle.min.js

jquery.cycle.min.js

1894 ms

shortcodes.js

shortcodes.js

2217 ms

shortcodes.js

shortcodes.js

1863 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

1851 ms

woocommerce_2.3.js

woocommerce_2.3.js

1867 ms

woocommerce.js

woocommerce.js

1879 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

1811 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

1779 ms

slider.min.js

slider.min.js

1747 ms

jquery.ui.touch-punch-min.js

jquery.ui.touch-punch-min.js

1779 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1815 ms

new-tile.jpg

new-tile.jpg

893 ms

flags18.png

flags18.png

1634 ms

Raepak-logo.png

Raepak-logo.png

1130 ms

cosmetics-banner.jpg

cosmetics-banner.jpg

6659 ms

Catalogue_tile.jpg

Catalogue_tile.jpg

1683 ms

Stock_Products_Tile.jpg

Stock_Products_Tile.jpg

1432 ms

pumps-tile.jpg

pumps-tile.jpg

2242 ms

Premium_Acrylic_Tile.jpg

Premium_Acrylic_Tile.jpg

2238 ms

PP_Airless_Tile.jpg

PP_Airless_Tile.jpg

1685 ms

Bath_Tile.jpg

Bath_Tile.jpg

5014 ms

Cosmetics_Tile.jpg

Cosmetics_Tile.jpg

3555 ms

Bottles_Tile.jpg

Bottles_Tile.jpg

2236 ms

caps_tile_short.jpg

caps_tile_short.jpg

2488 ms

Jars_Tile.jpg

Jars_Tile.jpg

4604 ms

FB-01-25-200-75x75.jpg

FB-01-25-200-75x75.jpg

2224 ms

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf

157 ms

Airless-Jar-with-Mirror-TIle-75x75.jpg

Airless-Jar-with-Mirror-TIle-75x75.jpg

2278 ms

dI-qzxlKVQA6TUC5RKSb3z8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

dI-qzxlKVQA6TUC5RKSb3z8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

156 ms

PyqsDANUgLi2UsdO-d4iZQ.woff

PyqsDANUgLi2UsdO-d4iZQ.woff

222 ms

Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf

Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf

177 ms

l1cOQ90roY9yC7voEhngDD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

l1cOQ90roY9yC7voEhngDD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

304 ms

raepak_footer_logo.png

raepak_footer_logo.png

2614 ms

header-search-mini.png

header-search-mini.png

2584 ms

ip_query.php

ip_query.php

1401 ms

initiate_dialog.gif

initiate_dialog.gif

2790 ms

message-box.gif

message-box.gif

2729 ms

tracker.php

tracker.php

2244 ms

last-tweets-line.png

last-tweets-line.png

1445 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

1536 ms

translateelement.css

translateelement.css

176 ms

main.js

main.js

554 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

363 ms

www.raepak.com

www.raepak.com

4063 ms

loadingAnimation.gif

loadingAnimation.gif

1241 ms

menu-arrow.png

menu-arrow.png

1457 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

1470 ms

element_main.js

element_main.js

522 ms

collect

collect

48 ms

collect

collect

278 ms

translate_24dp.png

translate_24dp.png

551 ms

l

l

90 ms

googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png

googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png

521 ms

Accessibility Review

raepak.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

raepak.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

raepak.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raepak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Raepak.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

raepak.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Raepak. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: