Tools & Wizards About Us
raffel.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

raffel.com

Raffel Systems

Page Load Speed

11.3 sec in total

First Response

445 ms

Resources Loaded

10.3 sec

Page Rendered

534 ms

raffel.com screenshot

About Website

Visit raffel.com now to see the best up-to-date Raffel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about raffel.com

Raffel Systems develops, manufactures and supplies electronic controls and custom industrial controls for a variety of industrial and commercial applications.

Visit raffel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Raffel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 445 ms and then it took 10.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

raffel.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,010 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

raffel.com

445 ms

www.raffel.com

634 ms

global.min.css

439 ms

js

56 ms

js

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Raffel.com, 19% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 13% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Raffel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 312.3 kB (19%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Raffel.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 37.8 kB

  • Original 44.3 kB
  • After minification 28.7 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.6 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 49.7 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Raffel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 187.3 kB

  • Original 303.9 kB
  • After minification 303.9 kB
  • After compression 116.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 187.3 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 37.5 kB

  • Original 46.7 kB
  • After minification 46.6 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Raffel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (33%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Raffel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

raffel.com

raffel.com

445 ms

www.raffel.com

www.raffel.com

634 ms

global.min.css

global.min.css

439 ms

js

js

56 ms

js

js

87 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

686 ms

global.min.js

global.min.js

752 ms

cjz3qpa.js

cjz3qpa.js

209 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

74 ms

logo@2x.png

logo@2x.png

606 ms

china-flag.svg

china-flag.svg

607 ms

noisy-texture.png

noisy-texture.png

625 ms

raffelssytems-homepage.png

raffelssytems-homepage.png

8817 ms

noisy-texture-light.png

noisy-texture-light.png

618 ms

linedrawing1.png

linedrawing1.png

1138 ms

linedrawing2.png

linedrawing2.png

1256 ms

linedrawing3.png

linedrawing3.png

1277 ms

gridmap.png

gridmap.png

1170 ms

promo-bg.jpg

promo-bg.jpg

1297 ms

picturefill.min.js

picturefill.min.js

1796 ms

js

js

150 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

194 ms

d

d

37 ms

d

d

67 ms

d

d

115 ms

d

d

67 ms

d

d

43 ms

collect

collect

28 ms

collect

collect

36 ms

p.gif

p.gif

146 ms

raffelssytems-homepage.png

raffelssytems-homepage.png

852 ms

Accessibility Review

raffel.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

raffel.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

raffel.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raffel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Raffel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

raffel.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Raffel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: