Tools & Wizards About Us
rafha.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 55

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

rafha.com

???? ????? ??????? ??????

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

54 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

521 ms

rafha.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rafha.com homepage info - get ready to check Rafha best content for Egypt right away, or after learning these important things about rafha.com

????? - ??????? - ????? - ????? ????? - ??????? ????? - ????? - ????? - ????

Visit rafha.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rafha.com page load time and found that the first response time was 54 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Rafha.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

rafha.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rafha.com

54 ms

vb

31 ms

275 ms

yuiloader-dom-event.js

19 ms

connection-min.js

11 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Rafha.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Raoom.org.sa and 1% (1 request) were made to Shy22.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (907 ms) relates to the external source Raoom.org.sa.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 347.3 kB (40%)

Content Size

859.8 kB

After Optimization

512.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rafha.com main page is 859.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 459.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 135.7 kB

  • Original 151.9 kB
  • After minification 141.8 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 135.7 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 20.7 kB

  • Original 459.0 kB
  • After minification 438.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rafha images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 92.7 kB

  • Original 134.8 kB
  • After minification 133.3 kB
  • After compression 42.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.7 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 98.2 kB

  • Original 114.1 kB
  • After minification 87.1 kB
  • After compression 15.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rafha.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 98.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (50%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rafha. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rafha.com

rafha.com

54 ms

vb

vb

31 ms

275 ms

yuiloader-dom-event.js

yuiloader-dom-event.js

19 ms

connection-min.js

connection-min.js

11 ms

vbulletin-core.js

vbulletin-core.js

18 ms

css.php

css.php

160 ms

css.php

css.php

144 ms

css.php

css.php

137 ms

vbulletin_md5.js

vbulletin_md5.js

14 ms

vbulletin_read_marker.js

vbulletin_read_marker.js

27 ms

almuzhim.jpg

almuzhim.jpg

206 ms

half-riyal_440.jpg

half-riyal_440.jpg

907 ms

3cx11120.gif

3cx11120.gif

534 ms

17hN6

17hN6

228 ms

misc.php

misc.php

324 ms

misc.php

misc.php

313 ms

misc.php

misc.php

312 ms

bg23.png

bg23.png

142 ms

bg1.png

bg1.png

140 ms

bghdr.png

bghdr.png

141 ms

bg10.png

bg10.png

142 ms

logo.png

logo.png

149 ms

hdrd_03.png

hdrd_03.png

142 ms

hdrd_06.png

hdrd_06.png

142 ms

logo22.png

logo22.png

142 ms

hdrd_01.png

hdrd_01.png

143 ms

bg12.png

bg12.png

144 ms

bg11.png

bg11.png

145 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

144 ms

search_rtl.png

search_rtl.png

145 ms

kvr22604.jpg

kvr22604.jpg

158 ms

thkr5.gif

thkr5.gif

147 ms

thkr4.gif

thkr4.gif

148 ms

thkr3.gif

thkr3.gif

145 ms

thkr2.gif

thkr2.gif

148 ms

thkr1.gif

thkr1.gif

148 ms

D3wah.jpg

D3wah.jpg

156 ms

navbit-home.png

navbit-home.png

146 ms

collapse_40b.png

collapse_40b.png

147 ms

bg13.png

bg13.png

148 ms

bg15.png

bg15.png

149 ms

forum_old-48.png

forum_old-48.png

149 ms

subforum_old-48.png

subforum_old-48.png

147 ms

rss_40b.png

rss_40b.png

149 ms

lastpost-left.png

lastpost-left.png

149 ms

profile.png

profile.png

149 ms

forum.png

forum.png

151 ms

homepage.png

homepage.png

149 ms

icon14.png

icon14.png

37 ms

icon5.png

icon5.png

36 ms

icon10.png

icon10.png

35 ms

bg16.png

bg16.png

36 ms

gradient-greytowhite.png

gradient-greytowhite.png

37 ms

users_online.png

users_online.png

36 ms

forum_stats.png

forum_stats.png

36 ms

legend.png

legend.png

36 ms

forum_new-16.png

forum_new-16.png

35 ms

forum_old-16.png

forum_old-16.png

36 ms

category-16.png

category-16.png

36 ms

forum_link-16.png

forum_link-16.png

36 ms

bg17.png

bg17.png

36 ms

cron.php

cron.php

127 ms

FF.png

FF.png

36 ms

F2.png

F2.png

35 ms

hvq99898.gif

hvq99898.gif

249 ms

post_old.gif

post_old.gif

10 ms

Accessibility Review

rafha.com accessibility score

55

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

rafha.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rafha.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    AR

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1256

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rafha.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Arabic language. Our system also found out that Rafha.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1256. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

rafha.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rafha. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: