Tools & Wizards About Us
ragtag.co.nz screenshot

Report Summary

  • 1

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    19% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

ragtag.co.nz

RAGTAG | Cleaning Rag Supplies

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

114 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

451 ms

ragtag.co.nz screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RAGTAG content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ragtag.co.nz

Cleaning Supplies, Commercial Cleaning, Home Cleaning, Rags, Cleaning Products, Ragtag Cleaning Supplies, cleaning products new Zealand

Visit ragtag.co.nz

Key Findings

We analyzed Ragtag.co.nz page load time and found that the first response time was 114 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ragtag.co.nz performance score

1

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,420 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.9 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ragtag.co.nz

114 ms

www.ragtag.co.nz

419 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.6.css

171 ms

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

203 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.6.min.js

598 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Ragtag.co.nz, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ragtag.co.nz.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 413.8 kB (37%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

694.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ragtag.co.nz main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 588.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 28.6 kB

  • Original 34.6 kB
  • After minification 33.1 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 22.9 kB

  • Original 588.0 kB
  • After minification 565.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RAGTAG images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 298.7 kB

  • Original 410.2 kB
  • After minification 380.8 kB
  • After compression 111.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 298.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 63.7 kB

  • Original 75.4 kB
  • After minification 59.9 kB
  • After compression 11.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ragtag.co.nz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (29%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

36

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RAGTAG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ragtag.co.nz

ragtag.co.nz

114 ms

www.ragtag.co.nz

www.ragtag.co.nz

419 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.6.css

jquery-ui-1.8.6.css

171 ms

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

203 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.6.min.js

jquery-ui-1.8.6.min.js

598 ms

jquery.bxGallery.1.1.min.js

jquery.bxGallery.1.1.min.js

367 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

1003 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

134 ms

960_24_col.css

960_24_col.css

171 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

210 ms

ragtag.css

ragtag.css

211 ms

curvycorners.src.js

curvycorners.src.js

268 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

209 ms

shadow.png

shadow.png

82 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

134 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

45 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

81 ms

pinterest.png

pinterest.png

80 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

113 ms

wordpress.png

wordpress.png

82 ms

money-bacvk.png

money-bacvk.png

135 ms

tagline.png

tagline.png

112 ms

cat-bottom.jpg

cat-bottom.jpg

127 ms

well-h.jpg

well-h.jpg

147 ms

shelf_rags.jpg

shelf_rags.jpg

424 ms

trucks_pic.jpg

trucks_pic.jpg

222 ms

mem-h.jpg

mem-h.jpg

165 ms

member-bottom.jpg

member-bottom.jpg

173 ms

special.jpg

special.jpg

211 ms

green.jpg

green.jpg

199 ms

product_thumb.php

product_thumb.php

365 ms

product_thumb.php

product_thumb.php

363 ms

product_thumb.php

product_thumb.php

391 ms

product_thumb.php

product_thumb.php

337 ms

product_thumb.php

product_thumb.php

396 ms

product_thumb.php

product_thumb.php

512 ms

product_thumb.php

product_thumb.php

553 ms

product_thumb.php

product_thumb.php

569 ms

product_thumb.php

product_thumb.php

566 ms

contact_pic_large.jpg

contact_pic_large.jpg

433 ms

footer-logo.jpg

footer-logo.jpg

452 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

27 ms

shoppingBg.png

shoppingBg.png

445 ms

menu-back.jpg

menu-back.jpg

464 ms

searchback.jpg

searchback.jpg

484 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

left-Bg.jpg

left-Bg.jpg

466 ms

cat-h.jpg

cat-h.jpg

484 ms

presto-bg.jpg

presto-bg.jpg

484 ms

member-login-back.jpg

member-login-back.jpg

493 ms

sign.png

sign.png

490 ms

addtocart-h.jpg

addtocart-h.jpg

491 ms

footer-bg.jpg

footer-bg.jpg

490 ms

Accessibility Review

ragtag.co.nz accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ragtag.co.nz best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ragtag.co.nz SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ragtag.co.nz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ragtag.co.nz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ragtag.co.nz

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RAGTAG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: