Tools & Wizards About Us
rail-videos.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 52

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

rail-videos.net

RailPictures.Net - High Quality Railroad, Train, Railway Photos, Pictures & News

Page Load Speed

992 ms in total

First Response

67 ms

Resources Loaded

776 ms

Page Rendered

149 ms

rail-videos.net screenshot

About Website

Visit rail-videos.net now to see the best up-to-date Rail Videos content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rail-videos.net

Online railroad photo database, featuring over 756,000 high-quality photographs of trains, railroads, plus discussion forums, and more.

Visit rail-videos.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rail-videos.net page load time and found that the first response time was 67 ms and then it took 925 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rail-videos.net performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value27,110 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value37.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rail-videos.net

67 ms

pop.cgi

12 ms

menu.js

9 ms

pubcode.min.js

9 ms

show_ads.js

7 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Rail-videos.net, 8% (3 requests) were made to Media.fastclick.net and 8% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (183 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 180.8 kB (49%)

Content Size

370.0 kB

After Optimization

189.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Rail-videos.net main page is 370.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 149.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 114.8 kB

  • Original 141.4 kB
  • After minification 138.5 kB
  • After compression 26.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 34.2 kB

  • Original 149.8 kB
  • After minification 115.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rail Videos needs image optimization as it can save up to 34.2 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 31.9 kB

  • Original 78.7 kB
  • After minification 73.8 kB
  • After compression 46.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 40% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (60%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rail Videos. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rail-videos.net

rail-videos.net

67 ms

pop.cgi

pop.cgi

12 ms

menu.js

menu.js

9 ms

pubcode.min.js

pubcode.min.js

9 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

7 ms

pop.cgi

pop.cgi

10 ms

awmmenupath.gif

awmmenupath.gif

6 ms

awmlib4.js

awmlib4.js

7 ms

logo-menu.jpg

logo-menu.jpg

97 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

97 ms

rule.jpg

rule.jpg

97 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

101 ms

spacer-gray.gif

spacer-gray.gif

97 ms

shadowleft.gif

shadowleft.gif

101 ms

rule-center.gif

rule-center.gif

97 ms

spacer-wide.gif

spacer-wide.gif

96 ms

spacer-wide2.gif

spacer-wide2.gif

98 ms

16899.jpg

16899.jpg

99 ms

16895.jpg

16895.jpg

97 ms

shadowright.gif

shadowright.gif

97 ms

get.media

get.media

11 ms

buttonspace.gif

buttonspace.gif

8 ms

haschild2.gif

haschild2.gif

7 ms

haschild.gif

haschild.gif

8 ms

background-menu.jpg

background-menu.jpg

9 ms

click.here

click.here

103 ms

dt

dt

50 ms

skeleton.js

skeleton.js

58 ms

dtc

dtc

13 ms

10 ms

1517744-02.jpg

1517744-02.jpg

23 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

28 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

57 ms

ads

ads

183 ms

ga.js

ga.js

14 ms

osd.js

osd.js

38 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

15 ms

Accessibility Review

rail-videos.net accessibility score

52

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

rail-videos.net best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rail-videos.net SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rail-videos.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rail-videos.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

rail-videos.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rail Videos. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: