Tools & Wizards About Us
railgc.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

railgc.com

SMART 953 - Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

80 ms

Resources Loaded

937 ms

Page Rendered

421 ms

railgc.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to railgc.com homepage info - get ready to check Rail Gc best content right away, or after learning these important things about railgc.com

SMART 953 Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation SMART 953 Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation Home SMART Transportation Division GO 953 We are General Committee of Adjustment 953 of SMART Transp...

Visit railgc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Railgc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

railgc.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.038

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

railgc.com

80 ms

railgc.com

237 ms

mediaelementplayer.min.css

42 ms

css.css

95 ms

style-media.css

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Railgc.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (286 ms) belongs to the original domain Railgc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 89.6 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Railgc.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 39.3 kB

  • Original 45.3 kB
  • After minification 35.0 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.3 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 36.0 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 965.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rail Gc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 149.1 kB
  • After minification 149.1 kB
  • After compression 140.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 52.2 kB
  • After minification 52.1 kB
  • After compression 46.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Railgc.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (63%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rail Gc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

railgc.com

railgc.com

80 ms

railgc.com

railgc.com

237 ms

mediaelementplayer.min.css

mediaelementplayer.min.css

42 ms

css.css

css.css

95 ms

style-media.css

style-media.css

73 ms

default.css

default.css

80 ms

jquery-1.7.1.js

jquery-1.7.1.js

109 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

79 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

89 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

114 ms

scrolltopcontrol.js

scrolltopcontrol.js

103 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

105 ms

jflickrfeed.min.js

jflickrfeed.min.js

113 ms

tabs.js

tabs.js

111 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

19 ms

jquery.tweet.js

jquery.tweet.js

128 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

155 ms

custom.js

custom.js

131 ms

default.js

default.js

135 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

165 ms

logo-footer.svg

logo-footer.svg

139 ms

cms-admin-media.css

cms-admin-media.css

88 ms

jquery.jgrowl.min.css

jquery.jgrowl.min.css

85 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

72 ms

superfish.css

superfish.css

75 ms

glyphicons.css

glyphicons.css

286 ms

entypo.css

entypo.css

286 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

284 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

284 ms

css

css

30 ms

banner1.jpg

banner1.jpg

133 ms

none22_600x400_fe2.jpg

none22_600x400_fe2.jpg

61 ms

logo-footer_600x400_d55.jpeg

logo-footer_600x400_d55.jpeg

61 ms

main-page-pic-orig_600x400_fe2.jpg

main-page-pic-orig_600x400_fe2.jpg

62 ms

137_600x400_fe2.jpg

137_600x400_fe2.jpg

63 ms

117_600x400_fe2.jpg

117_600x400_fe2.jpg

61 ms

112_600x400_fe2.jpg

112_600x400_fe2.jpg

63 ms

j-ferguson_600x400_fe2.jpg

j-ferguson_600x400_fe2.jpg

63 ms

smart-td-logo_600x400_fe2.jpg

smart-td-logo_600x400_fe2.jpg

64 ms

amtraklogo_600x400_fe2.jpg

amtraklogo_600x400_fe2.jpg

64 ms

up-logo_600x400_3a1.png

up-logo_600x400_3a1.png

211 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

18 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

30 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

52 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

53 ms

themify.woff

themify.woff

50 ms

glyphicons-regular.woff

glyphicons-regular.woff

64 ms

entypo.woff

entypo.woff

51 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

47 ms

jquery.jgrowl.min.js

jquery.jgrowl.min.js

62 ms

Accessibility Review

railgc.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

railgc.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

railgc.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Railgc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Railgc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

railgc.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rail Gc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: