3.2 sec in total
233 ms
2.8 sec
241 ms
Visit railway.web.id now to see the best up-to-date Railway content for Indonesia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about railway.web.id
Your Blog Description here!
Visit railway.web.idWe analyzed Railway.web.id page load time and found that the first response time was 233 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
railway.web.id performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value3.6 s
61/100
25%
Value8.8 s
15/100
10%
Value3,490 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.523
15/100
15%
Value18.6 s
3/100
10%
233 ms
266 ms
199 ms
44 ms
44 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Railway.web.id, 16% (12 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 13% (10 requests) were made to Blogger.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Blogger.googleusercontent.com.
Page size can be reduced by 211.7 kB (18%)
1.2 MB
989.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Railway.web.id main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 693.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Railway images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 151.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 151.5 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Railway.web.id has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (58%)
66
28
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Railway. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
railway.web.id
233 ms
www.railway.web.id
266 ms
www.railway.web.id
199 ms
55013136-widget_css_bundle.css
44 ms
jquery.min.js
44 ms
gpt.js
145 ms
adsbygoogle.js
192 ms
halamanav.js
91 ms
gpt.js
206 ms
bg_body.gif
202 ms
tombolcari.gif
73 ms
header-seputar-kereta-api.jpg
299 ms
time.png
187 ms
KA-Argo-Bromo-Anggrek-New-Generation.jpg
550 ms
KA-Argo-Bromo-Anggrek-New-Generation.jpg
865 ms
KERETA%20API%20WIJAYA%20KUSUMA.jpg
849 ms
KERETA%20API%20WIJAYA%20KUSUMA.jpg
850 ms
KA-Papandayan.jpg
767 ms
KA-Papandayan.jpg
890 ms
CL-Dhoho.jpg
848 ms
CL-Dhoho.jpg
1366 ms
Dobel-Track-Mojokerto.jpg
1365 ms
Dobel-Track-Mojokerto.jpg
1365 ms
authorization.css
62 ms
user.png
288 ms
batas.gif
243 ms
bullet.png
245 ms
authorization.css
116 ms
pubads_impl.js
92 ms
show_ads_impl.js
252 ms
ads
568 ms
container.html
24 ms
zrt_lookup.html
30 ms
ads
597 ms
ads
490 ms
gen_204
76 ms
pixel
147 ms
16557979976806169517
143 ms
icon.png
36 ms
abg_lite.js
50 ms
omrhp.js
61 ms
Q12zgMmT.js
129 ms
window_focus.js
149 ms
qs_click_protection.js
166 ms
ufs_web_display.js
113 ms
shopping
139 ms
load_preloaded_resource.js
155 ms
abg_lite.js
153 ms
02221ee50246d3c2837239ae1fe911f3.js
134 ms
icon.png
98 ms
reactive_library.js
322 ms
ca-pub-2114108982561980
379 ms
pixel
302 ms
pixel
301 ms
62bHydCX.html
131 ms
css
233 ms
5V18NYvu480-MhEwM9GnRWI4eEDE4R9vNdKnUFhfqY0.js
35 ms
bounce
77 ms
pixel
88 ms
rum
71 ms
activeview
95 ms
pixel
38 ms
ea8IacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVBg3etBD7SQ.ttf
146 ms
ea8FacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVDv79pA.ttf
147 ms
rum
132 ms
6131117250134980949
80 ms
feedback_grey600_24dp.png
21 ms
fullscreen_api_adapter.js
133 ms
interstitial_ad_frame.js
139 ms
activeview
135 ms
settings_grey600_24dp.png
130 ms
15270969050934126990
122 ms
gen_204
112 ms
activeview
105 ms
css
62 ms
railway.web.id accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text
Form elements do not have associated labels
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
railway.web.id best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
railway.web.id SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ID
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Railway.web.id can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Railway.web.id main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
railway.web.id
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Railway. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: