Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

rainmatter.org

Rainmatter Foundation - Non-profit working on environment, climate change, green livelihood projects in India.

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

60 ms

Resources Loaded

932 ms

Page Rendered

359 ms

rainmatter.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rainmatter content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rainmatter.org

Non-profit working on environment, climate change, green livelihood projects in India.

Visit rainmatter.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Rainmatter.org page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rainmatter.org performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,020 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.432

22/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rainmatter.org

60 ms

css2

34 ms

grid.css

57 ms

style.css

67 ms

logo.svg

50 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Rainmatter.org, 13% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (543 ms) belongs to the original domain Rainmatter.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 20.4 kB (3%)

Content Size

636.4 kB

After Optimization

616.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Rainmatter.org main page is 636.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 409.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 8.6 kB
  • After minification 8.6 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 12.2 kB

  • Original 409.0 kB
  • After minification 396.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rainmatter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 159.9 kB
  • After minification 159.9 kB
  • After compression 157.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 58.9 kB
  • After minification 58.9 kB
  • After compression 58.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rainmatter.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (26%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rainmatter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rainmatter.org accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rainmatter.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rainmatter.org SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rainmatter.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rainmatter.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rainmatter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: