6.7 sec in total
1.3 sec
4.4 sec
1 sec
Welcome to rainydaywebdesign.com homepage info - get ready to check Rainydaywebdesign best content right away, or after learning these important things about rainydaywebdesign.com
Visit rainydaywebdesign.comWe analyzed Rainydaywebdesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
rainydaywebdesign.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value820 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value8.1 s
42/100
10%
1257 ms
111 ms
462 ms
506 ms
490 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Rainydaywebdesign.com, 19% (8 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 14% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rainydaywebdesign.com.
Page size can be reduced by 25.5 kB (10%)
250.1 kB
224.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Rainydaywebdesign.com main page is 250.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 140.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rainydaywebdesign images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 268 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 367 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rainydaywebdesign.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (91%)
35
3
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rainydaywebdesign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rainydaywebdesign.com
1257 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
111 ms
style.min.css
462 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
506 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
490 ms
styles.css
199 ms
css
403 ms
style.css
199 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
194 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
403 ms
frontend.min.css
366 ms
post-2745.css
401 ms
all.min.css
437 ms
v4-shims.min.css
449 ms
global.css
451 ms
css
572 ms
jetpack.css
527 ms
jquery.min.js
552 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
514 ms
v4-shims.min.js
453 ms
animations.min.css
452 ms
photon.min.js
513 ms
index.js
452 ms
index.js
454 ms
smoothscroll.js
497 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
455 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
724 ms
waypoints.min.js
742 ms
core.min.js
724 ms
swiper.min.js
741 ms
share-link.min.js
554 ms
dialog.min.js
741 ms
frontend.min.js
553 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
1029 ms
e-202241.js
709 ms
ginko.jpg
310 ms
SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf
263 ms
SlGWmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXmMh3eDs1Yg.ttf
264 ms
tDbK2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr4nAfcGw.ttf
289 ms
tDbX2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr4lLz5CwOnTQ.ttf
290 ms
tDbI2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr9rAA.ttf
287 ms
tDbV2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOJGiRD7OwQ.ttf
285 ms
rainydaywebdesign.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rainydaywebdesign.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rainydaywebdesign.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rainydaywebdesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rainydaywebdesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rainydaywebdesign.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rainydaywebdesign. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: