Tools & Wizards About Us
rajanigroup.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

rajanigroup.in

Rajani Group of Companies

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

377 ms

rajanigroup.in screenshot

About Website

Visit rajanigroup.in now to see the best up-to-date Rajani Group content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rajanigroup.in

Rajani Groupe

Visit rajanigroup.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Rajanigroup.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rajanigroup.in performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,970 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.483

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rajanigroup.in

1372 ms

css

23 ms

css

34 ms

bootstrap.css

1265 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.css

506 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Rajanigroup.in, 7% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rajanigroup.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (46%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rajanigroup.in main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 878.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 24.7 kB

  • Original 28.6 kB
  • After minification 21.3 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.2 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 858.2 kB
  • After minification 849.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rajani Group images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 617.2 kB

  • Original 878.2 kB
  • After minification 862.1 kB
  • After compression 261.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 617.2 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 357.6 kB

  • Original 408.9 kB
  • After minification 350.9 kB
  • After compression 51.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rajanigroup.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 357.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (64%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rajani Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rajanigroup.in

rajanigroup.in

1372 ms

css

css

23 ms

css

css

34 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

1265 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.css

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.css

506 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

752 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

1001 ms

style.css

style.css

1012 ms

menu.css

menu.css

530 ms

slicknav.css

slicknav.css

767 ms

component.css

component.css

804 ms

color1.css

color1.css

1007 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

1750 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js

1067 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

1996 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

1275 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1036 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

1348 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.js

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.js

1273 ms

jquery.scrollTo.min.js

jquery.scrollTo.min.js

1285 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

1286 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

1529 ms

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

1799 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

1537 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

1622 ms

retina-1.1.0.min.js

retina-1.1.0.min.js

1794 ms

jpreloader.min.js

jpreloader.min.js

1796 ms

classie.js

classie.js

1797 ms

boxesFx.js

boxesFx.js

1894 ms

wait.js

wait.js

2062 ms

custom_general_box.js

custom_general_box.js

2061 ms

custom_general.js

custom_general.js

2065 ms

oswald-regular-webfont.woff

oswald-regular-webfont.woff

516 ms

oswald-light-webfont.woff

oswald-light-webfont.woff

341 ms

oswald-bold-webfont.woff

oswald-bold-webfont.woff

634 ms

logo.png

logo.png

461 ms

tea_main.jpg

tea_main.jpg

462 ms

incense_main.jpg

incense_main.jpg

776 ms

species_main.jpg

species_main.jpg

1023 ms

soap_main.jpg

soap_main.jpg

954 ms

matchstick_main.jpg

matchstick_main.jpg

710 ms

Incense.png

Incense.png

773 ms

tea.png

tea.png

886 ms

spices.png

spices.png

963 ms

close.png

close.png

1044 ms

event1.jpg

event1.jpg

1787 ms

pdf-icon.png

pdf-icon.png

1150 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1201 ms

bVp4nhwFIXU-r3LqUR8DSEXZfvqDQow1E55U9qI_yj0.ttf

bVp4nhwFIXU-r3LqUR8DSEXZfvqDQow1E55U9qI_yj0.ttf

30 ms

19544059

19544059

31 ms

player.js

player.js

104 ms

player.css

player.css

84 ms

ga.js

ga.js

20 ms

vuid.min.js

vuid.min.js

96 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

22 ms

proxy.html

proxy.html

102 ms

plus.png

plus.png

879 ms

Accessibility Review

rajanigroup.in accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rajanigroup.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rajanigroup.in SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rajanigroup.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rajanigroup.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rajanigroup.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rajani Group. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: