Tools & Wizards About Us
ramco.us.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

ramco.us.com

Asphalt & Concrete Slurry Recycling in Southern California

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

162 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

187 ms

ramco.us.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ramco.us.com homepage info - get ready to check Ramco best content right away, or after learning these important things about ramco.us.com

Ramco has nearly 70-years of experience in the concrete recycling industry, serving the San Bernardino, Los Angeles, San Diego and Ventura Counties.

Visit ramco.us.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ramco.us.com page load time and found that the first response time was 162 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ramco.us.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ramco.us.com

162 ms

www.ramco.us.com

500 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

77 ms

jquery.min.js

153 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

227 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Ramco.us.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (748 ms) belongs to the original domain Ramco.us.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 363.4 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Ramco.us.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 649.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 355.9 kB

  • Original 428.5 kB
  • After minification 425.6 kB
  • After compression 72.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 355.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 396.1 kB
  • After minification 390.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ramco images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 649.4 kB
  • After minification 649.4 kB
  • After compression 647.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 80 (91%)

Requests Now

88

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ramco. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 81 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ramco.us.com

ramco.us.com

162 ms

www.ramco.us.com

www.ramco.us.com

500 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

77 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

153 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

227 ms

layerslider.utils.js

layerslider.utils.js

378 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

404 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

232 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

403 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

306 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

302 ms

modernizr-custom.min.js

modernizr-custom.min.js

306 ms

ultimate.min.js

ultimate.min.js

456 ms

ultimate_bg.min.js

ultimate_bg.min.js

411 ms

modal-all.min.js

modal-all.min.js

457 ms

custom.js

custom.js

452 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

452 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

454 ms

index.js

index.js

456 ms

index.js

index.js

531 ms

wpcf7r-fe.js

wpcf7r-fe.js

531 ms

gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js

gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js

531 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

532 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

533 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

536 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

600 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

601 ms

controlgroup.min.js

controlgroup.min.js

602 ms

checkboxradio.min.js

checkboxradio.min.js

604 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

605 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

608 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

674 ms

resizable.min.js

resizable.min.js

675 ms

draggable.min.js

draggable.min.js

679 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

678 ms

droppable.min.js

droppable.min.js

678 ms

progressbar.min.js

progressbar.min.js

678 ms

selectable.min.js

selectable.min.js

748 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

681 ms

slider.min.js

slider.min.js

598 ms

spinner.min.js

spinner.min.js

529 ms

tooltip.min.js

tooltip.min.js

529 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

457 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

524 ms

effect-blind.min.js

effect-blind.min.js

525 ms

effect-bounce.min.js

effect-bounce.min.js

433 ms

effect-clip.min.js

effect-clip.min.js

424 ms

effect-drop.min.js

effect-drop.min.js

425 ms

effect-explode.min.js

effect-explode.min.js

406 ms

effect-fade.min.js

effect-fade.min.js

453 ms

effect-fold.min.js

effect-fold.min.js

453 ms

effect-highlight.min.js

effect-highlight.min.js

452 ms

effect-pulsate.min.js

effect-pulsate.min.js

452 ms

effect-size.min.js

effect-size.min.js

453 ms

effect-scale.min.js

effect-scale.min.js

429 ms

effect-shake.min.js

effect-shake.min.js

447 ms

effect-slide.min.js

effect-slide.min.js

447 ms

effect-transfer.min.js

effect-transfer.min.js

449 ms

doubletaptogo.js

doubletaptogo.js

448 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

446 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

447 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

454 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

454 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

455 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

451 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

460 ms

jquery.waitforimages.js

jquery.waitforimages.js

454 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

452 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

452 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

453 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

454 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

455 ms

skrollr.js

skrollr.js

462 ms

TweenLite.min.js

TweenLite.min.js

453 ms

smoothPageScroll.min.js

smoothPageScroll.min.js

458 ms

default_dynamic_callback.js

default_dynamic_callback.js

456 ms

default.min.js

default.min.js

458 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

455 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

463 ms

qode-like.min.js

qode-like.min.js

452 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

456 ms

index.js

index.js

451 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

452 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

527 ms

ramco-arcpsa-logo.png

ramco-arcpsa-logo.png

457 ms

logo_black.png

logo_black.png

453 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

455 ms

bg-ramco-home-video.jpg

bg-ramco-home-video.jpg

604 ms

bg_asphalt.jpg

bg_asphalt.jpg

529 ms

quality_service_integrity.png

quality_service_integrity.png

80 ms

simi-valley-website-design-and-development.png

simi-valley-website-design-and-development.png

140 ms

Accessibility Review

ramco.us.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ramco.us.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

ramco.us.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ramco.us.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ramco.us.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ramco.us.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ramco. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: