Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

randomscreening.com

ScreenBot | The Random Drug Test/Screening Scheduling and Notification Service

Page Load Speed

999 ms in total

First Response

174 ms

Resources Loaded

761 ms

Page Rendered

64 ms

randomscreening.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to randomscreening.com homepage info - get ready to check Random Screening best content right away, or after learning these important things about randomscreening.com

Independent random drug test/screening scheduling and notification service for individuals and organizations.

Visit randomscreening.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Randomscreening.com page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 825 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

randomscreening.com performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

randomscreening.com

174 ms

randomscreening.com

297 ms

js

123 ms

style.css

74 ms

table_bottom.jpg

146 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Randomscreening.com, 11% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (297 ms) belongs to the original domain Randomscreening.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 8.3 kB (21%)

Content Size

38.9 kB

After Optimization

30.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Randomscreening.com main page is 38.9 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 31.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 4.9 kB
  • After minification 4.6 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 31.3 kB
  • After minification 28.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Random Screening images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 2.7 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB
  • After compression 547 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Randomscreening.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Random Screening. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

randomscreening.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

randomscreening.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

randomscreening.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Randomscreening.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Randomscreening.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Random Screening. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: