Tools & Wizards About Us
rangementplus.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

rangementplus.com

Rangement Plus | Système de rangement résidentiel, Garde-robes

Page Load Speed

819 ms in total

First Response

73 ms

Resources Loaded

490 ms

Page Rendered

256 ms

rangementplus.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rangementplus.com now to see the best up-to-date Rangement Plus content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rangementplus.com

Rangement Plus offre des solutions et des produits de rangement personnalisés pour maximiser les espaces de rangement dans les résidences.

Visit rangementplus.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rangementplus.com page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 746 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rangementplus.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value830 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rangementplus.com

73 ms

rangementplus.com

125 ms

gtm.js

109 ms

analytics.js

57 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Rangementplus.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (218 ms) belongs to the original domain Rangementplus.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.9 kB (4%)

Content Size

846.4 kB

After Optimization

809.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rangementplus.com main page is 846.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 530.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 28.0 kB

  • Original 36.1 kB
  • After minification 33.9 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 530.1 kB
  • After minification 524.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rangement Plus images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 196.0 kB
  • After minification 196.0 kB
  • After compression 194.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 84.1 kB
  • After minification 84.1 kB
  • After compression 82.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rangementplus.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (73%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rangement Plus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rangementplus.com

rangementplus.com

73 ms

rangementplus.com

rangementplus.com

125 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

109 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

57 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

36 ms

style.css

style.css

50 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

97 ms

css

css

34 ms

style.css

style.css

84 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

81 ms

script.js

script.js

79 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

91 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

80 ms

mediaelementplayer.min.css

mediaelementplayer.min.css

80 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

80 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

81 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

94 ms

velocity.min.js

velocity.min.js

134 ms

script.js

script.js

92 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

210 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

211 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

218 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

218 ms

js

js

78 ms

googlemap.js

googlemap.js

217 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

js

js

174 ms

logo-blanc.png

logo-blanc.png

142 ms

bg-header.png

bg-header.png

142 ms

logo-slogan.png

logo-slogan.png

141 ms

walkin-accueil-web.jpg

walkin-accueil-web.jpg

143 ms

bg-headerboxes.png

bg-headerboxes.png

142 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

61 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

49 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

49 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

50 ms

Accessibility Review

rangementplus.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rangementplus.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rangementplus.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rangementplus.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rangementplus.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rangementplus.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rangement Plus. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: