1.3 sec in total
255 ms
968 ms
94 ms
Welcome to rankchecker.net homepage info - get ready to check Rankchecker best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about rankchecker.net
Search engine optimization tool helps you analize your website ranking on google, msn, and yahoo.
Visit rankchecker.netWe analyzed Rankchecker.net page load time and found that the first response time was 255 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
rankchecker.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
77/100
10%
Value2.4 s
91/100
25%
Value4.6 s
71/100
10%
Value3,300 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
255 ms
150 ms
246 ms
177 ms
152 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Rankchecker.net, 8% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (310 ms) belongs to the original domain Rankchecker.net.
Page size can be reduced by 412.4 kB (65%)
630.1 kB
217.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Rankchecker.net main page is 630.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 574.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rankchecker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 391.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 391.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rankchecker.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (77%)
48
11
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rankchecker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rankchecker.net
255 ms
Style.css
150 ms
WebResource.axd
246 ms
WebResource.axd
177 ms
WebResource.axd
152 ms
show_ads.js
6 ms
KonaLibInline.js
8 ms
logo.gif
77 ms
cornerG_tl.gif
146 ms
cornerG_tr.gif
147 ms
cornerG_bl.gif
150 ms
cornerG_br.gif
153 ms
pixel-w.gif
244 ms
btn_go.gif
245 ms
cornerW_tl.gif
249 ms
cornerW_tr.gif
248 ms
cornerW_bl.gif
249 ms
cornerW_br.gif
250 ms
ca-pub-7590227562986566.js
42 ms
zrt_lookup.html
81 ms
show_ads_impl.js
80 ms
topmenu_bgl.gif
147 ms
topmenu_rightl.gif
147 ms
topmenu_bgd.gif
168 ms
topmenu_leftd.gif
171 ms
topmenu_separator.gif
174 ms
topmenu_rightd.gif
177 ms
btn_help.gif
218 ms
topmenu_leftl.gif
218 ms
topsubmenu_bgl.gif
238 ms
topsubmenu_leftl.gif
244 ms
topsubmenu_rightl.gif
245 ms
bgcen.gif
251 ms
bgtop.gif
300 ms
btn_rank.gif
299 ms
bgbot.gif
310 ms
KonaHtml5.js
15 ms
KonaGet.js
52 ms
ads
288 ms
osd.js
23 ms
ads
260 ms
ga.js
46 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
m_js_controller.js
20 ms
abg.js
43 ms
favicon
47 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
42 ms
favicon
60 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
29 ms
s
20 ms
x_button_blue2.png
2 ms
rankchecker.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
rankchecker.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
rankchecker.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rankchecker.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rankchecker.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rankchecker.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rankchecker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: