Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

rankeen.com

Rankeen.com: los mejores Rankings de la Web.

Page Load Speed

6.5 sec in total

First Response

226 ms

Resources Loaded

5.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

rankeen.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rankeen.com now to see the best up-to-date Rankeen content for Mexico and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rankeen.com

La mejor y más interesante información de Internet, Informática, Entretenimiento, Medios, Curiosidades, Turismo y Humor ordenada en Rankings

Visit rankeen.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rankeen.com page load time and found that the first response time was 226 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rankeen.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value47.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90,840 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value112.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rankeen.com

226 ms

estilo_principal.css

76 ms

cabecera.css

116 ms

menu.css

121 ms

estilo_index.css

149 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Rankeen.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to Image2.pubmatic.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Rt2602.infolinks.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 529.9 kB (49%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

546.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Rankeen.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 732.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 44.5 kB

  • Original 57.9 kB
  • After minification 56.8 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 28.2 kB

  • Original 275.7 kB
  • After minification 247.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rankeen images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 450.3 kB

  • Original 732.8 kB
  • After minification 732.2 kB
  • After compression 282.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 450.3 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 10.3 kB
  • After minification 8.5 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rankeen.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (42%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

53

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rankeen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rankeen.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

rankeen.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rankeen.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rankeen.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rankeen.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rankeen. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: