1.2 sec in total
71 ms
919 ms
231 ms
Visit rankerx.com now to see the best up-to-date Rankerx content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rankerx.com
Best Marketing Software: Rank your website using the best high quality software, Free download, 7 days free trial with Best Marketing software
Visit rankerx.comWe analyzed Rankerx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 71 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
rankerx.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value3.4 s
68/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value1,010 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.075
95/100
15%
Value7.7 s
45/100
10%
71 ms
14 ms
22 ms
36 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Rankerx.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (492 ms) relates to the external source Staticxx.facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 763.9 kB (53%)
1.4 MB
684.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Rankerx.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 622.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 145.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rankerx needs image optimization as it can save up to 145.0 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 335.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 335.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 256.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rankerx.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 256.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (64%)
67
24
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rankerx. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rankerx.com
71 ms
analytics.js
14 ms
owl.carousel.css
22 ms
owl.theme.css
36 ms
component.css
35 ms
normalize.css
35 ms
pace-theme-flash.css
48 ms
bootstrap.min.css
72 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
50 ms
font-awesome.min.css
60 ms
style.css
55 ms
magic_space.css
54 ms
responsive.css
70 ms
animate.min.css
80 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
97 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
96 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
127 ms
settings.css
94 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
95 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
145 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
120 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
120 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
118 ms
all.js
325 ms
plusone.js
59 ms
bootstrap.min.js
117 ms
pace.min.js
129 ms
jquery.unveil.min.js
129 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
141 ms
waypoints.min.js
141 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
139 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
169 ms
jquery.appear.js
153 ms
jquery.animateNumbers.js
154 ms
core.js
163 ms
collect
18 ms
css
29 ms
css
36 ms
logo_condensed.png
17 ms
slide_one.jpg
192 ms
AUTOMATED_1.jpg
26 ms
HIGHAUTHORITYSITES_1.jpg
18 ms
HIGHSUCCESSRATES_1.jpg
36 ms
SCHEDULEYOURWORK_1.jpg
32 ms
MAGICWIZARD_1.jpg
34 ms
THIRD-PARTYSERVICES_1.jpg
34 ms
LINKSCHEME_1.jpg
50 ms
GOOGLERECAPTCHA_1.jpg
48 ms
INTERFACE_123.png
50 ms
browser.jpg
170 ms
widget_v2.134.js
14 ms
188 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
8 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
119 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
120 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
120 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
121 ms
xd_arbiter.php
287 ms
xd_arbiter.php
492 ms
sdk.js
213 ms
timer.png
118 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
63 ms
fastbutton
112 ms
loader.gif
59 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
57 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
36 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
102 ms
postmessageRelay
80 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
12 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
11 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
33 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
26 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
30 ms
like.php
67 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
3 ms
share_button.php
74 ms
rankerx.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements
rankerx.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
rankerx.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rankerx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rankerx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rankerx.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rankerx. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: