Tools & Wizards About Us
rankingxpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

rankingxpress.com

#1 SEO, PPC, SMO, Web Design Development Digital Marketing Agency

Page Load Speed

7.2 sec in total

First Response

122 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

3.4 sec

rankingxpress.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rankingxpress.com now to see the best up-to-date Rankingxpress content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rankingxpress.com

RankingXpress Digital is a full-service digital marketing agency providing SEO, PPC, SMO Google Ads services, web design & development services at low cost.

Visit rankingxpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rankingxpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rankingxpress.com performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rankingxpress.com

122 ms

www.rankingxpress.com

734 ms

bootstrap.min.css

117 ms

font-awesome.min.css

147 ms

owl.carousel.css

114 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Rankingxpress.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Rankingxpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 147.5 kB (4%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rankingxpress.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 88.8 kB

  • Original 113.8 kB
  • After minification 104.1 kB
  • After compression 25.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 52.3 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rankingxpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 134.7 kB
  • After minification 134.7 kB
  • After compression 131.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 59.7 kB
  • After minification 59.7 kB
  • After compression 56.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rankingxpress.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (64%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rankingxpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rankingxpress.com

rankingxpress.com

122 ms

www.rankingxpress.com

www.rankingxpress.com

734 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

117 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

147 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

114 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

192 ms

style.css

style.css

184 ms

js

js

147 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

180 ms

styles.css

styles.css

298 ms

css

css

298 ms

style.css

style.css

297 ms

socialshare.css

socialshare.css

296 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

296 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

295 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

710 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

726 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

724 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

727 ms

script.js

script.js

709 ms

index.js

index.js

723 ms

index.js

index.js

726 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

726 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

730 ms

global.js

global.js

729 ms

jquery.scrollTo.js

jquery.scrollTo.js

729 ms

api.js

api.js

706 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

725 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

728 ms

index.js

index.js

728 ms

socialshare.js

socialshare.js

997 ms

css

css

135 ms

css

css

134 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

910 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

740 ms

logo.png

logo.png

553 ms

banner_img.jpg

banner_img.jpg

1146 ms

logo_icon_bg.png

logo_icon_bg.png

1187 ms

app-store-optimization.png

app-store-optimization.png

1157 ms

SEO-starter-guide.png

SEO-starter-guide.png

707 ms

what-kind-of-businesses-need-local-seo-services-1.png

what-kind-of-businesses-need-local-seo-services-1.png

723 ms

is-seo-worth-the-expense.png

is-seo-worth-the-expense.png

723 ms

how-to-grow-your-business.png

how-to-grow-your-business.png

1198 ms

SEO-VS-SEM-3.png

SEO-VS-SEM-3.png

1354 ms

is-seo-still-relevant.jpg

is-seo-still-relevant.jpg

1180 ms

b2b-marketing-strategies.png

b2b-marketing-strategies.png

1170 ms

complete-seo-audit-checklist.png

complete-seo-audit-checklist.png

1179 ms

10-powerful-social-media-marketing-tips.jpg

10-powerful-social-media-marketing-tips.jpg

1364 ms

7-tested-technique-to-improve-seo-ranking-on-google.png

7-tested-technique-to-improve-seo-ranking-on-google.png

1380 ms

10seo-factor.png

10seo-factor.png

1364 ms

digital-approach-to-empower-your-business.png

digital-approach-to-empower-your-business.png

1378 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

281 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

593 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

612 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

610 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

597 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

766 ms

collect

collect

530 ms

Accessibility Review

rankingxpress.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rankingxpress.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rankingxpress.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rankingxpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rankingxpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rankingxpress.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rankingxpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: