5.7 sec in total
1.5 sec
4.1 sec
118 ms
Visit raptccq.com now to see the best up-to-date Raptccq content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about raptccq.com
Visit raptccq.comWe analyzed Raptccq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
raptccq.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value8.4 s
19/100
10%
Value1,200 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.174
69/100
15%
Value8.9 s
35/100
10%
1491 ms
58 ms
6 ms
354 ms
687 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Raptccq.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to and 6% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Nishinihonfactor.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 57.0 kB (21%)
273.0 kB
216.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Raptccq.com main page is 273.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 139.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Raptccq images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.8 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Raptccq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (50%)
42
21
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Raptccq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
1491 ms
js
58 ms
javascript;base64,CiAgICB3aW5kb3cuZGF0YUxheWVyID0gd2luZG93LmRhdGFMYXllciB8fCBbXTsKICAgIGZ1bmN0aW9uIGd0YWcoKXtkYXRhTGF5ZXIucHVzaChhcmd1bWVudHMpO30KICAgIGd0YWcoJ2pzJywgbmV3IERhdGUoKSk7CgogICAgZ3RhZygnY29uZmlnJywgJ1VBLTEwOTAyMjQxOC0yJyk7CiAgICBndGFnKCdjb25maWcnLCAnQVctODI5NDk1NzYwJyk7CiAg
6 ms
autoptimize_f567e19fe80ca8e04c8a039460b7d4af.css
354 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
687 ms
ZChyLmNvbmNhdGVtb2ppKTpyLndwZW1vamkmJnIudHdlbW9qaSYmKGQoci50d2Vtb2ppKSxkKHIud3BlbW9qaSkpKX0od2luZG93LGRvY3VtZW50LHdpbmRvdy5fd3BlbW9qaVNldHRpbmdzKTsKCQk=
4 ms
default-font-css.php
525 ms
jquery.js
704 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
528 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
529 ms
infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js
529 ms
all.css
33 ms
autoptimize_single_f5c621d30cbc5670ae7e9a9a993d1d86.js
701 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.min.js
731 ms
jquery.easing.compatibility.min.js
731 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
731 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
858 ms
jquery.validate1.7.min.js
878 ms
form_validate.min.js
879 ms
jquery.formatter.min.js
881 ms
jquery.autoKana.min.js
880 ms
slick.min.js
882 ms
slickSetup.min.js
1027 ms
function.min.js
1054 ms
javascript;base64,KGZ1bmN0aW9uKHcsZCxzLGwsaSl7d1tsXT13W2xdfHxbXTt3W2xdLnB1c2goeydndG0uc3RhcnQnOgpuZXcgRGF0ZSgpLmdldFRpbWUoKSxldmVudDonZ3RtLmpzJ30pO3ZhciBmPWQuZ2V0RWxlbWVudHNCeVRhZ05hbWUocylbMF0sCmo9ZC5jcmVhdGVFbGVtZW50KHMpLGRsPWwhPSdkYXRhTGF5ZXInPycmbD0nK2w6Jyc7ai5hc3luYz10cnVlO2ouc3JjPQonaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xldGFnbWFuYWdlci5jb20vZ3RtLmpzP2lkPScraStkbDtmLnBhcmVudE5vZGUuaW5zZXJ0QmVmb3JlKGosZik7Cn0pKHdpbmRvdyxkb2N1bWVudCwnc2NyaXB0JywnZGF0YUxheWVyJywnR1RNLU5TS1JIOUonKTs=
2 ms
javascript;base64,CiAgICAgICAgKGZ1bmN0aW9uKCQpewogICAgICAgICAgJChkb2N1bWVudCkucmVhZHkoZnVuY3Rpb24oKSB7CiAgICAgIAkJCXZhciB1YSA9IG5hdmlnYXRvci51c2VyQWdlbnQ7CiAgICAgIAkJCWlmKHVhLmluZGV4T2YoJ2lQaG9uZScpID4gMCB8fCB1YS5pbmRleE9mKCdBbmRyb2lkJykgPiAwKSB7CiAgICAgIAkJCQkJJCgnLlRlbEJuJykud3JhcCgnPGEgaHJlZj0idGVsOjAxMjAtMjAwLTA4OCI+PC9hPicpOwogICAgICAJCQl9CiAgICAgIAkJfSk7CiAgICAgICAgfShqUXVlcnkpKTsKICAgIAkJ
2 ms
lazysizes.min.js
1055 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1055 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
267 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
13 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
26 ms
lineBnPC.png
176 ms
logo.png
170 ms
gtm.js
41 ms
headerTel.png
174 ms
headerIcon_line.png
175 ms
headerIcon_contact.png
175 ms
headerIcon_menu.png
175 ms
logo_drawer.png
208 ms
lineBnSP.png
219 ms
headerTelS.png
246 ms
RegImage.png
243 ms
Bn_avispa.png
241 ms
lineBnPC.png
175 ms
headerIcon_line.png
176 ms
headerIcon_contact.png
176 ms
logo.png
175 ms
headerTel.png
171 ms
headerIcon_menu.png
175 ms
raptccq.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
raptccq.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
raptccq.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raptccq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Raptccq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
raptccq.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Raptccq. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: