Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

rarestone.capital

Rarestone | Web3 Investment & Venture Studio

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

70 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

195 ms

rarestone.capital screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rarestone.capital homepage info - get ready to check Rarestone best content right away, or after learning these important things about rarestone.capital

Visit rarestone.capital

Key Findings

We analyzed Rarestone.capital page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rarestone.capital performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.056

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.8 s

45/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rarestone.capital

70 ms

rarestone.capital

48 ms

www.rarestone.capital

350 ms

www.rarestone.ventures

252 ms

rarestone-noir.4145d29ab.min.css

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Rarestone.capital, 30% (9 requests) were made to Cdn.prod.website-files.com and 20% (6 requests) were made to Assets.website-files.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (350 ms) belongs to the original domain Rarestone.capital.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 81.9 kB (26%)

Content Size

319.5 kB

After Optimization

237.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Rarestone.capital main page is 319.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 199.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 81.8 kB

  • Original 100.4 kB
  • After minification 100.3 kB
  • After compression 18.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 199.6 kB
  • After minification 199.6 kB
  • After compression 199.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 52 B

  • Original 19.5 kB
  • After minification 19.5 kB
  • After compression 19.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rarestone.capital has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (40%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rarestone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rarestone.capital accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rarestone.capital best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rarestone.capital SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rarestone.capital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rarestone.capital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rarestone. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: