Access rashmedia.ru. Рекламное агентство полного цикла Rash Media

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

75/100

10%

rashmedia.ru

1706 ms

screen.css

264 ms

style.css

278 ms

mootools-1.2.5-core-yc.js

455 ms

MenuMatic.css

319 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Rashmedia.ru, 3% (2 requests) were made to Stg.odnoklassniki.ru and 3% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Rashmedia.ru.

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Rashmedia.ru main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 245.8 kB

Original 310.0 kB
After minification 307.1 kB
After compression 64.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 245.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 178.5 kB

Original 1.4 MB
After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rash Media needs image optimization as it can save up to 178.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 141.2 kB

Original 186.5 kB
After minification 160.9 kB
After compression 45.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 141.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 26.9 kB

Original 33.3 kB
After minification 23.7 kB
After compression 6.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rashmedia.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rash Media. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

RU
Language Claimed

RU
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rashmedia.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rashmedia.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rashmedia.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rash Media. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Рекламное агентство полного цикла Rash Media — Нижний Новгород

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

rashmedia.ru

screen.css

style.css

mootools-1.2.5-core-yc.js

MenuMatic.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

rashmedia.ru

screen.css

style.css

mootools-1.2.5-core-yc.js

MenuMatic.css

MenuMatic_0.68.3.js

share-buttons-user.css

odkl_share.css

share-buttons.js

plusone.js

share.js

openapi.js

odkl_share.js

odkl_init.js

share.js

widgets.js

button.js

odkl_share.js

print.css

cb=gapi.loaded_0

connect.js

new_share_buttons_sprite.gif

rss.png

3_0_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_0_pageviews

search.gif

date.png

user.png

comments.png

raioni1.jpg

raioni2.jpg

raioni3.jpg

raioni4.jpg

raioni5.jpg

raioni6.jpg

raioni7.jpg

raioni8.jpg

raioni9.jpg

raioni10.jpg

raioni11.jpg

raioni12.jpg

raioni13.jpg

raioni14.jpg

raioni15.jpg