Tools & Wizards About Us
rasierer-tests.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

rasierer-tests.de

Rasierer Test 2023 - TOP Rasierer / Elektrorasierer im Test

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

230 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

rasierer-tests.de screenshot

About Website

Visit rasierer-tests.de now to see the best up-to-date Rasierer Test S content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rasierer-tests.de

Rasierer Test 2023 entdecke die Rasierer Test Sieger: Elektrorasierer Test ✔Trockenrasierer ✔ NassrasiererTest ✔ Bartschneider ✔ Körperrasierer ...

Visit rasierer-tests.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Rasierer-tests.de page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rasierer-tests.de performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

41/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rasierer-tests.de

230 ms

www.rasierer-tests.de

965 ms

style.css

98 ms

jquery-2.1.4.min.js

15 ms

style.css

193 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Rasierer-tests.de, 30% (22 requests) were made to M.media-amazon.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (965 ms) belongs to the original domain Rasierer-tests.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 157.8 kB (20%)

Content Size

798.3 kB

After Optimization

640.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rasierer-tests.de main page is 798.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 486.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 148.8 kB

  • Original 178.5 kB
  • After minification 156.7 kB
  • After compression 29.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 148.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 308 B

  • Original 486.9 kB
  • After minification 486.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rasierer Test S images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 119.6 kB
  • After minification 119.6 kB
  • After compression 113.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 13.3 kB
  • After minification 13.3 kB
  • After compression 11.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rasierer-tests.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (35%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

47

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rasierer Test S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rasierer-tests.de

rasierer-tests.de

230 ms

www.rasierer-tests.de

www.rasierer-tests.de

965 ms

style.css

style.css

98 ms

jquery-2.1.4.min.js

jquery-2.1.4.min.js

15 ms

style.css

style.css

193 ms

default.css

default.css

281 ms

tablepress-custom.css

tablepress-custom.css

282 ms

style.css

style.css

291 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

494 ms

jquery-migrate.js

jquery-migrate.js

295 ms

script.js

script.js

297 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

377 ms

comment-reply.js

comment-reply.js

379 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

151 ms

41sil1KP2IL._SL160_.jpg

41sil1KP2IL._SL160_.jpg

142 ms

416EjTKzq8L._SL160_.jpg

416EjTKzq8L._SL160_.jpg

148 ms

41dsvSm7yQL._SL160_.jpg

41dsvSm7yQL._SL160_.jpg

164 ms

41lda1unWcL._SL160_.jpg

41lda1unWcL._SL160_.jpg

169 ms

41NYg58wR+L._SL160_.jpg

41NYg58wR+L._SL160_.jpg

166 ms

410vyaPfWqL._SL160_.jpg

410vyaPfWqL._SL160_.jpg

165 ms

41szCnNIq6L._SL160_.jpg

41szCnNIq6L._SL160_.jpg

168 ms

51sS29lDVbS._SL160_.jpg

51sS29lDVbS._SL160_.jpg

165 ms

51S4t2QI1fL._SL160_.jpg

51S4t2QI1fL._SL160_.jpg

166 ms

51YLUFut6sL._SL160_.jpg

51YLUFut6sL._SL160_.jpg

167 ms

51aeCbuPueL._SL160_.jpg

51aeCbuPueL._SL160_.jpg

169 ms

51u+InojG6L._SL160_.jpg

51u+InojG6L._SL160_.jpg

168 ms

41OF+nPyWvL._SL160_.jpg

41OF+nPyWvL._SL160_.jpg

172 ms

41kigLE5iwL._SL160_.jpg

41kigLE5iwL._SL160_.jpg

169 ms

41aCUyir+fL._SL160_.jpg

41aCUyir+fL._SL160_.jpg

169 ms

51HwbmoJHcL._SL160_.jpg

51HwbmoJHcL._SL160_.jpg

170 ms

41c2Se1jm4L._SL160_.jpg

41c2Se1jm4L._SL160_.jpg

170 ms

416c8rcvFXL._SL160_.jpg

416c8rcvFXL._SL160_.jpg

176 ms

41VqRBkDmPL._SL160_.jpg

41VqRBkDmPL._SL160_.jpg

175 ms

41PdCORfXnL._SL160_.jpg

41PdCORfXnL._SL160_.jpg

175 ms

41u1seWwaTL._SL160_.jpg

41u1seWwaTL._SL160_.jpg

176 ms

41Y7iumqCtL._SL160_.jpg

41Y7iumqCtL._SL160_.jpg

177 ms

rasierer-test-logo-weiss.svg

rasierer-test-logo-weiss.svg

140 ms

rasierer-test-logo.svg

rasierer-test-logo.svg

138 ms

Philips-Bartschneider-Series-5000-BT5200.jpg

Philips-Bartschneider-Series-5000-BT5200.jpg

200 ms

braunsilk-epilladyshaverls5160test.jpg

braunsilk-epilladyshaverls5160test.jpg

236 ms

Braun-Series-9-Rasierapparat-9296cc.jpg

Braun-Series-9-Rasierapparat-9296cc.jpg

236 ms

braunsilkepil7test.jpg

braunsilkepil7test.jpg

236 ms

Gilette-Labs-Heated-Razor-Nassrasierer.jpg

Gilette-Labs-Heated-Razor-Nassrasierer.jpg

236 ms

vetformenelcremetest.jpg

vetformenelcremetest.jpg

240 ms

panasonicer1611profitest.jpg

panasonicer1611profitest.jpg

297 ms

Intimrasierer.jpg

Intimrasierer.jpg

332 ms

braun-silk-expert-ipl-haarentfernungsger%C3%A4t-BD-5009.jpg

braun-silk-expert-ipl-haarentfernungsger%C3%A4t-BD-5009.jpg

426 ms

7138A2bhLgL._SY679_.jpg

7138A2bhLgL._SY679_.jpg

334 ms

philips-series-3000-nasen-ohren-haartrimmer-NT3160-10.jpg

philips-series-3000-nasen-ohren-haartrimmer-NT3160-10.jpg

341 ms

gillettemach3rasierertest.jpg

gillettemach3rasierertest.jpg

342 ms

gillette-venus-vibrance-test.jpg

gillette-venus-vibrance-test.jpg

393 ms

Ratgeber.jpg

Ratgeber.jpg

515 ms

Braun-Series-9-Rasierapparat-9296cc-600x339.jpg

Braun-Series-9-Rasierapparat-9296cc-600x339.jpg

432 ms

logo-normal-amazon-de.jpg

logo-normal-amazon-de.jpg

436 ms

Braun-Series-9-9395cc-Braun-Series-9-9395cc--102x50.jpg

Braun-Series-9-9395cc-Braun-Series-9-9395cc--102x50.jpg

437 ms

Philips-SP986016-Series-9000-Prestige-102x50.jpg

Philips-SP986016-Series-9000-Prestige-102x50.jpg

483 ms

Braun-Series-9-Rasierapparat-9296cc-89x50.jpg

Braun-Series-9-Rasierapparat-9296cc-89x50.jpg

516 ms

Philips-Multigroom-Series-7000-MG7745-15-25x50.jpg

Philips-Multigroom-Series-7000-MG7745-15-25x50.jpg

521 ms

Philips-BG7025-15-Bodygroom-Series-7000-74x50.jpg

Philips-BG7025-15-Bodygroom-Series-7000-74x50.jpg

530 ms

panasonic-er-gk-60-102x50.jpg

panasonic-er-gk-60-102x50.jpg

531 ms

Philips-Bartschneider-Series-5000-BT5200-89x50.jpg

Philips-Bartschneider-Series-5000-BT5200-89x50.jpg

571 ms

Panasonic-ER-GD61-K503-102x50.jpg

Panasonic-ER-GD61-K503-102x50.jpg

601 ms

Braun-Bartschneider-und-Trimmer-BT5090-89x50.jpg

Braun-Bartschneider-und-Trimmer-BT5090-89x50.jpg

606 ms

braunls5560silkepilladylest-89x50.jpg

braunls5560silkepilladylest-89x50.jpg

610 ms

braunsilk-epilladyshaverls5160test-89x50.jpg

braunsilk-epilladyshaverls5160test-89x50.jpg

624 ms

philips-satin-shave-advanced-brl-13000-102x50.jpg

philips-satin-shave-advanced-brl-13000-102x50.jpg

624 ms

Panasonic-HSM-ER-DGP82--83x50.jpg

Panasonic-HSM-ER-DGP82--83x50.jpg

660 ms

panasonic-er-1611-89x50.jpg

panasonic-er-1611-89x50.jpg

688 ms

panasonic-profi-haarschneidemaschine-er-1421-89x50.jpg

panasonic-profi-haarschneidemaschine-er-1421-89x50.jpg

697 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

215 ms

collect

collect

21 ms

collect

collect

28 ms

js

js

87 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

89 ms

Accessibility Review

rasierer-tests.de accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rasierer-tests.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rasierer-tests.de SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rasierer-tests.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rasierer-tests.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rasierer-tests.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rasierer Test S. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: