Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

rastertragedy.com

The Raster Tragedy at Low-Resolution Revisited | Beat Stamm

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

192 ms

Resources Loaded

878 ms

Page Rendered

161 ms

rastertragedy.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rastertragedy.com homepage info - get ready to check Raster Tragedy best content right away, or after learning these important things about rastertragedy.com

Font hinting is an opportunity to get on-screen text rendering as close to the art of printing as the available screen technologies allow.

Visit rastertragedy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rastertragedy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 192 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rastertragedy.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rastertragedy.com

192 ms

RTR100S.css

105 ms

RTRNav.js

218 ms

RTR080S.css

55 ms

RTR090S.css

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rastertragedy.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (218 ms) belongs to the original domain Rastertragedy.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 98.7 kB (79%)

Content Size

124.4 kB

After Optimization

25.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Rastertragedy.com main page is 124.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 57.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

  • Original 19.8 kB
  • After minification 19.7 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 66% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 48.5 kB

  • Original 57.3 kB
  • After minification 56.9 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 37.1 kB

  • Original 47.3 kB
  • After minification 45.4 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rastertragedy.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (82%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Raster Tragedy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rastertragedy.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

rastertragedy.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

rastertragedy.com SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rastertragedy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rastertragedy.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Raster Tragedy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: