5.8 sec in total
671 ms
4.6 sec
534 ms
Welcome to rater.in homepage info - get ready to check Rater best content right away, or after learning these important things about rater.in
Trusted work from home job opportunities on Search quality rater, Ads quality rater, maps quality evaluator and social media evaluator.
Visit rater.inWe analyzed Rater.in page load time and found that the first response time was 671 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
rater.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
3/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value14.7 s
1/100
10%
Value3,680 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.021
100/100
15%
Value23.4 s
1/100
10%
671 ms
288 ms
33 ms
71 ms
28 ms
Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Rater.in, 16% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Rater.in.
Page size can be reduced by 119.4 kB (16%)
764.4 kB
645.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Rater.in main page is 764.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 280.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rater images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 641 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rater.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (74%)
95
25
The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rater. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rater.in
671 ms
style.min.css
288 ms
style.min.css
33 ms
css
71 ms
style.min.css
28 ms
style.min.css
27 ms
style.min.css
307 ms
style.css
40 ms
style.css
46 ms
kk-star-ratings.css
307 ms
css
40 ms
font-awesome.min.css
49 ms
jquery-ui.css
52 ms
simple-job-board-public.css
63 ms
screen.min.css
57 ms
frontend.min.css
58 ms
noo.css
82 ms
woocommerce.css
72 ms
custom.css
78 ms
font-awesome.min.css
105 ms
owl.carousel.css
103 ms
owl.theme.css
104 ms
jquery-confirm.min.css
106 ms
css
37 ms
css
38 ms
datatables.min.css
108 ms
chosen.css
357 ms
icon-picker.css
111 ms
font-awesome.min.css
115 ms
genericons.css
127 ms
dashicons.min.css
124 ms
js_composer.min.css
135 ms
jquery.datetimepicker.css
153 ms
bootstrap-wysihtml5.css
153 ms
g4802.png
151 ms
Appen-emblem-160x160.png
534 ms
Appen-emblem-150x150.png
616 ms
logo-1-160x72.png
544 ms
logo-1-150x72.png
567 ms
offernation-logo-160x160.jpg
672 ms
offernation-logo-150x150.jpg
596 ms
css
18 ms
js
95 ms
font-awesome.min.css
516 ms
email-decode.min.js
518 ms
scripts.js
550 ms
flying-pages.min.js
772 ms
kk-star-ratings.js
537 ms
front.min.js
538 ms
js.cookie.min.js
1532 ms
woocommerce.min.js
563 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
561 ms
brave.js
550 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
548 ms
comment-reply.min.js
527 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
526 ms
bootstrap.min.js
577 ms
hoverIntent-r7.min.js
576 ms
superfish-1.7.4.min.js
576 ms
jplayer-2.5.0.min.js
799 ms
noo.min.js
572 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
570 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
566 ms
member.min.js
555 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
555 ms
noo.login.social.min.js
531 ms
bootstrap3-wysihtml5.custom.min.js
528 ms
jquery.datetimepicker.js
540 ms
job.min.js
539 ms
wp-embed.min.js
646 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
443 ms
rocket-loader.min.js
396 ms
ysense-160x160.png
614 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
26 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
38 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
38 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
39 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
36 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
37 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
37 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
38 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
41 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
40 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
41 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf
40 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
39 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
713 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
665 ms
ysense-150x150.png
375 ms
remote-jobs-online.jpg
757 ms
work-from-home-jobs-without-investment.jpg
605 ms
trusted-work-from-home-jobs.jpg
849 ms
online-work-from-home.jpeg
993 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf
34 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf
34 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf
33 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16WXh0ow.ttf
34 ms
students-online-jobs.jpg
886 ms
trusted-online-jobs.jpg
879 ms
paid-internships-online.jpg
1163 ms
online-jobs-home.jpeg
1072 ms
rating-jobs-online.jpeg
1116 ms
virtual-internships-online.jpeg
1260 ms
person-in-beige-long-sleeve-shirt-using-macbook-pro-4065876.jpg
1626 ms
banner_contact.jpg
1354 ms
original-300x45.png
1467 ms
preloader.png
1325 ms
tDbV2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOJGiRD7OwQ.ttf
13 ms
tDbI2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr9rAA.ttf
13 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
378 ms
jquery.js
15 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
17 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
11 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
11 ms
woocommerce-add-to-cart.js
11 ms
icon-picker.js
284 ms
readmore.min.js
11 ms
rater.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
rater.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rater.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rater.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rater.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rater.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rater. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: