17.4 sec in total
7.8 sec
9.3 sec
300 ms
Visit ratethat.horse now to see the best up-to-date Rate That content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ratethat.horse
Want to pick more winners? Try the horse ratings that integrate systems, trends and statistics, with daily selections to keep you in the black.
Visit ratethat.horseWe analyzed Ratethat.horse page load time and found that the first response time was 7.8 sec and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
ratethat.horse performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.6 s
0/100
10%
Value10.5 s
0/100
25%
Value11.9 s
4/100
10%
Value6,540 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.521
15/100
15%
Value23.0 s
1/100
10%
7841 ms
107 ms
170 ms
157 ms
165 ms
Our browser made a total of 126 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Ratethat.horse, 12% (15 requests) were made to Cdn.datatables.net and 6% (8 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Ratethat.horse.
Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (79%)
2.7 MB
561.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Ratethat.horse main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rate That needs image optimization as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 544.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 544.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ratethat.horse needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 104 (90%)
115
11
The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rate That. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 66 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 40 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ratethat.horse
7841 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
107 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
170 ms
bbpress.css
157 ms
style.min.css
165 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.css
43 ms
buttons.dataTables.min.css
45 ms
select.dataTables.min.css
47 ms
fixedHeader.dataTables.min.css
51 ms
fixedColumns.dataTables.min.css
51 ms
responsive.dataTables.min.css
48 ms
jquery-ui.css
23 ms
mm-main.css
171 ms
mm-buttons.css
173 ms
font-awesome.min.css
25 ms
js_composer.min.css
335 ms
bootstrap.css
268 ms
main.css
318 ms
wt-visual-composer-extensions-front.css
306 ms
font-awesome.css
255 ms
entypo-fontello.css
313 ms
prettyPhoto.css
378 ms
main-media.css
380 ms
turquoise.css
405 ms
skin.css
395 ms
css
25 ms
css
29 ms
css
25 ms
css
27 ms
css
26 ms
css
26 ms
css
28 ms
style.css
434 ms
form-basic.min.css
431 ms
jquery.js
456 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
474 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
49 ms
dataTables.buttons.min.js
42 ms
buttons.colVis.min.js
42 ms
buttons.print.min.js
43 ms
pdfmake.min.js
27 ms
vfs_fonts.js
49 ms
jszip.min.js
17 ms
buttons.html5.min.js
43 ms
dataTables.select.min.js
43 ms
dataTables.fixedHeader.min.js
45 ms
dataTables.fixedColumns.min.js
44 ms
dataTables.responsive.min.js
48 ms
igsv-datatables.js
546 ms
jsapi
37 ms
igsv-gvizcharts.js
549 ms
global.js
551 ms
mm-common-core.js
552 ms
mm-preview.js
553 ms
jq-sticky-anything.min.js
552 ms
api.min.js
44 ms
modernizr-2.6.1.min.js
553 ms
conversion.js
45 ms
conditional.js
562 ms
main.js
644 ms
plugins.js
645 ms
wt-visual-composer-extensions-front.js
644 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
644 ms
bootstrap.min.js
645 ms
style.css
645 ms
font-awesome.min.css
767 ms
prettyPhoto.min.css
765 ms
owl.min.css
683 ms
animate.min.css
630 ms
editor.js
624 ms
gallery.min.js
620 ms
core.min.js
719 ms
widget.min.js
720 ms
accordion.min.js
635 ms
button.min.js
615 ms
datepicker.min.js
580 ms
mouse.min.js
577 ms
resizable.min.js
617 ms
draggable.min.js
710 ms
position.min.js
707 ms
dialog.min.js
564 ms
droppable.min.js
709 ms
progressbar.min.js
699 ms
selectable.min.js
711 ms
sortable.min.js
696 ms
stickThis.js
671 ms
wp-embed.min.js
589 ms
custom-pagination.js
591 ms
14 ms
jquery.sticky.js
588 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
664 ms
waypoints.min.js
645 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
638 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
653 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
645 ms
ui+en,table+en,controls+en,annotationchart+en.css
3 ms
dygraph,format+en,default+en,ui+en,timeline+en,geochart+en,table+en,gauge+en,annotatedtimeline+en,controls+en,corechart+en,annotationchart+en.I.js
19 ms
underscore.min.js
613 ms
annotatedtimeline.css
5 ms
vc_grid.min.js
616 ms
CQP3K3CHOak
188 ms
RTH-Logo-v3-02-e1450528097536.png
686 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-10-09-at-12.51.26.png
686 ms
139 ms
imfGW7soN-ntDfo1a_OKNPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
29 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
638 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
29 ms
analytics.js
80 ms
111 ms
collect
45 ms
www-player-vflMqr8uC.css
29 ms
www-embed-player.js
52 ms
base.js
71 ms
218 ms
212 ms
collect
227 ms
id
138 ms
fpJ246J2fJ0bYHH6KdX6NZQGrKMRoryxUcO6omD8DP8.js
135 ms
ad_status.js
153 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
55 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
60 ms
logo_ringo-vflOpz8ZI.png
60 ms
ga-audiences
22 ms
491053
62 ms
noanvgpf
39 ms
shim.4a5a3d93.js
19 ms
ratethat.horse accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ratethat.horse best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ratethat.horse SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ratethat.horse can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ratethat.horse main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ratethat.horse
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rate That. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: