3.4 sec in total
218 ms
2.8 sec
413 ms
Visit ratingkaro.com now to see the best up-to-date Ratingkaro content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ratingkaro.com
Forsale Lander
Visit ratingkaro.comWe analyzed Ratingkaro.com page load time and found that the first response time was 218 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ratingkaro.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value3.9 s
51/100
25%
Value3.3 s
90/100
10%
Value450 ms
63/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.9 s
43/100
10%
218 ms
90 ms
172 ms
168 ms
174 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Ratingkaro.com, 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Ratingkaro.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (60%)
1.9 MB
751.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Ratingkaro.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 866.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ratingkaro images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 628.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 628.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 419.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ratingkaro.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 419.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (71%)
66
19
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ratingkaro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ratingkaro.com
218 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
90 ms
opinionstage-style-common.css
172 ms
opinionstage-font.css
168 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
174 ms
um.min.css
257 ms
front.css
175 ms
style.css
177 ms
wp-reviewr.css
251 ms
custom.css
253 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
269 ms
style.css
255 ms
css
24 ms
bootstrap.css
339 ms
style.css
427 ms
font-awesome.min.css
350 ms
pixeden-icons.css
337 ms
style.css
348 ms
css
37 ms
css
45 ms
responsive.css
350 ms
jquery.js
587 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
422 ms
q2w3-fixed-widget.min.js
438 ms
af-tf-js.js
423 ms
anything-popup.js
437 ms
scripts-general.js
506 ms
um.min.js
764 ms
jquery-reviewr.js
506 ms
core.min.js
512 ms
widget.min.js
509 ms
mouse.min.js
617 ms
slider.min.js
618 ms
jquery.wp-reviewr.js
618 ms
jquery.equalizer.js
619 ms
scrollReveal.js
675 ms
zerif.js
676 ms
jquery.nicescroll.js
788 ms
zerif-nicescroll.js
706 ms
bootstrap.min.js
706 ms
jquery.knob.js
704 ms
smoothscroll.js
622 ms
zerif.js
628 ms
wp-embed.min.js
627 ms
library.js
324 ms
autoengage.js
72 ms
rating-1.png
325 ms
map25-redish.png
321 ms
envelope4-green.png
323 ms
sdk.js
15 ms
analytics.js
13 ms
singer_318-105607.jpg
313 ms
load.gif
1968 ms
search.png
312 ms
shattered.png
313 ms
politician.png
319 ms
actors.jpg
340 ms
Cricket-icon.png
340 ms
orange_man_reporter_news_tns.png
345 ms
collect
35 ms
judgeme.jpg
546 ms
246 ms
1bHRUMxmJHoup12DnI9XmQ.woff
25 ms
kU6VHbqMAZhaN_nXCmLQsQ.woff
25 ms
I1Pn3gihk5vyP0Yw5GqKsQ.woff
26 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
25 ms
7XUFZ5tgS-tD6QamInJTcdGU7DQ8I6RFMlK0vgclk7w.woff
26 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr24bNCNEoFTpS2BTjF6FB5E.woff
53 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr3XqdloEk0Ij5qwGW4qO9RM.woff
25 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wprx7IBmrqA5IG9z8WNe77b9o.woff
25 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr0bathaSTBR2c4i13_wzlb0.woff
52 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr8vGCqQ_I4mewSLySUmNzHA.woff
52 ms
search_icon.png
319 ms
configuration
84 ms
autoengage-desktop.css
33 ms
css
35 ms
xd_arbiter.php
26 ms
xd_arbiter.php
188 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
504 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
452 ms
ratingkaro.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ratingkaro.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ratingkaro.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ratingkaro.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ratingkaro.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ratingkaro.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ratingkaro. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: