7.7 sec in total
1.2 sec
5.6 sec
871 ms
Click here to check amazing Ratiodata content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ratiodata.de
Systemhaus für IT-Lösungen und Managed Services für Volksbanken, Sparkassen, Finanzdienstleister und regulierte Unternehmen
Visit ratiodata.deWe analyzed Ratiodata.de page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
ratiodata.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value16.1 s
0/100
25%
Value13.0 s
2/100
10%
Value490 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
1246 ms
584 ms
582 ms
587 ms
597 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Ratiodata.de, 4% (3 requests) were made to Analytics.ratiodata.de and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Ratiodata.de.
Page size can be reduced by 980.1 kB (44%)
2.2 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Ratiodata.de main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 144.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 144.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 494 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ratiodata images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 832.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 832.2 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ratiodata.de has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (79%)
75
16
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ratiodata. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ratiodata.de
1246 ms
f12-cf7-captcha.css
584 ms
styles.css
582 ms
nectar-slider.css
587 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
597 ms
grid-system.css
590 ms
style.css
694 ms
element-wpb-column-border.css
723 ms
element-recent-posts.css
728 ms
cf7.css
732 ms
responsive.css
736 ms
skin-material.css
744 ms
menu-dynamic.css
844 ms
default.css
866 ms
borlabs-cookie-1-de.css
871 ms
js_composer.min.css
876 ms
style.css
880 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
906 ms
style.css
983 ms
ytprefs.min.css
1004 ms
css
33 ms
jquery.min.js
1124 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1019 ms
jq-sticky-anything.min.js
1017 ms
borlabs-cookie-config-de.json.js
1062 ms
ytprefs.min.js
1138 ms
borlabs-cookie-prioritize.min.js
1131 ms
borlabs-cookie.min.js
1131 ms
css
18 ms
animate.min.css
1133 ms
style-non-critical.css
1260 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
1261 ms
core.css
1262 ms
fullscreen-legacy.css
1262 ms
f12-cf7-captcha-cf7.js
1265 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1264 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1278 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1468 ms
hooks.min.js
1467 ms
i18n.min.js
1112 ms
index.js
977 ms
index.js
971 ms
anime.min.js
969 ms
nectar-slider.js
1288 ms
stickThis.js
889 ms
tracker.js
1967 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
876 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
935 ms
priority.js
1951 ms
nectar-slider-priority.js
1017 ms
transit.min.js
971 ms
waypoints.js
991 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
1063 ms
hoverintent.min.js
1086 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
1224 ms
superfish.js
1119 ms
init.js
1397 ms
touchswipe.min.js
1091 ms
new-tab.js
1180 ms
scripts.js
1255 ms
fitvids.min.js
1191 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1222 ms
matomo.js
528 ms
ratiodata-logo-s.png
1201 ms
Ratiodata-2.jpg
1236 ms
210628_Johannes_Wand_-32.jpg
2871 ms
240710_Vertragsunterzeichnung-600x403.jpg
1218 ms
Martin-Beyer_Copyright-Aturvia-AG-600x403.jpg
1236 ms
Newsbild-GB-2023-900-x-604-px-600x403.jpg
2529 ms
TrendsampSolution-09-600x403.jpg
1398 ms
240422_Foto_Ratiodata_erhaelt_Auszeichnung_Bester_MSP-600x403.jpg
1410 ms
reload-icon.png
1483 ms
icomoon.woff
1486 ms
grid.png
2297 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
1585 ms
Fotolia_124020436_L.jpg
1713 ms
matomo.php
157 ms
matomo.php
132 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
260 ms
ratiodata.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ratiodata.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ratiodata.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ratiodata.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ratiodata.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ratiodata.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ratiodata. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: