1.7 sec in total
54 ms
763 ms
836 ms
Click here to check amazing Rationcard content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rationcard.net
Visit rationcard.netWe analyzed Rationcard.net page load time and found that the first response time was 54 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
rationcard.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.3 s
98/100
10%
Value1.4 s
100/100
25%
Value1.4 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.3 s
100/100
10%
54 ms
218 ms
33 ms
55 ms
103 ms
Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Rationcard.net, 17% (4 requests) were made to Themes.googleusercontent.com and 17% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (237 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 233.8 kB (61%)
382.1 kB
148.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Rationcard.net main page is 382.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 253.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 215.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 215.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rationcard images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 292 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 17.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rationcard.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.7 kB or 62% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (44%)
18
10
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rationcard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rationcard.net
54 ms
www.rationcard.net
218 ms
jquery.min.js
33 ms
3645911276-widget_css_bundle.css
55 ms
authorization.css
103 ms
font-awesome.css
50 ms
adsbygoogle.js
37 ms
3731899860-widgets.js
39 ms
plusone.js
136 ms
icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
93 ms
icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
93 ms
ca-pub-7144942111468669.js
122 ms
zrt_lookup.html
120 ms
show_ads_impl.js
62 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
77 ms
load6.gif
69 ms
8C2PVL2WIMUnPF90ukjrZQ.woff
67 ms
IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff
102 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-kxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
68 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12bxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
103 ms
ads
237 ms
osd.js
14 ms
ads
225 ms
abg.js
24 ms
rationcard.net accessibility score
rationcard.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rationcard.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ID
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rationcard.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rationcard.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rationcard.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rationcard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: