Tools & Wizards About Us
raybar.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

raybar.com

X-Ray Protection & Radiation Shielding Products | Radiation Protection

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

31 ms

Resources Loaded

786 ms

Page Rendered

344 ms

raybar.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ray Bar content for Iran. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about raybar.com

Ray-Bar Engineering Corp. has been providing x-ray shielding & radiation protection products for the medical healthcare industry for over 80 years. We offer an extensive range of products including wa...

Visit raybar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Raybar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

raybar.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,050 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

raybar.com

31 ms

www.raybar.com

215 ms

responsive_menu.js

16 ms

general.js

28 ms

gtm.js

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Raybar.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdn.gtranslate.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (258 ms) belongs to the original domain Raybar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 339.8 kB (29%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

824.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Raybar.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 560.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 286.1 kB

  • Original 372.3 kB
  • After minification 352.0 kB
  • After compression 86.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 286.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 51.4 kB

  • Original 560.6 kB
  • After minification 509.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ray Bar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 230.4 kB
  • After minification 230.4 kB
  • After compression 228.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 120 B

  • Original 974 B
  • After minification 974 B
  • After compression 854 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Raybar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 120 B or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (17%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ray Bar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

raybar.com

raybar.com

31 ms

www.raybar.com

www.raybar.com

215 ms

responsive_menu.js

responsive_menu.js

16 ms

general.js

general.js

28 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

61 ms

bxslider.css

bxslider.css

36 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

58 ms

ln.js

ln.js

61 ms

api.js

api.js

57 ms

header_bg.jpg

header_bg.jpg

138 ms

logo.png

logo.png

137 ms

top_nav_bg_w_cutout.png

top_nav_bg_w_cutout.png

137 ms

phone_icon.png

phone_icon.png

139 ms

search_icon.png

search_icon.png

139 ms

menu_icon.png

menu_icon.png

139 ms

scene3.jpg

scene3.jpg

199 ms

scene4.jpg

scene4.jpg

202 ms

scene5.jpg

scene5.jpg

205 ms

scene2.jpg

scene2.jpg

202 ms

scene1.jpg

scene1.jpg

200 ms

home_yellow_radiation_shielding.webp

home_yellow_radiation_shielding.webp

199 ms

home_yellow_fire_rated_glass.webp

home_yellow_fire_rated_glass.webp

200 ms

home_yellow_ballistic_bullet.webp

home_yellow_ballistic_bullet.webp

199 ms

home_yellow_service_support.png

home_yellow_service_support.png

200 ms

home_yellow_resource_library.png

home_yellow_resource_library.png

200 ms

home_radiation_shielding.jpg

home_radiation_shielding.jpg

201 ms

home_fire_rated_glass.jpg

home_fire_rated_glass.jpg

202 ms

Ballistics%20Logo.webp

Ballistics%20Logo.webp

202 ms

ray-bar-anti-microbal-bacterial-logo.webp

ray-bar-anti-microbal-bacterial-logo.webp

203 ms

home_black_image.jpg

home_black_image.jpg

212 ms

Ray-Bar%20Anti%20Microbal%20Bacterial%20LOGO.webp

Ray-Bar%20Anti%20Microbal%20Bacterial%20LOGO.webp

203 ms

home_content_image.webp

home_content_image.webp

202 ms

footer_bg.jpg

footer_bg.jpg

210 ms

footer_sprites.png

footer_sprites.png

212 ms

Oswald-Bold.ttf

Oswald-Bold.ttf

213 ms

Oswald-Regular.ttf

Oswald-Regular.ttf

220 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

145 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

258 ms

slideshow_arrow.png

slideshow_arrow.png

96 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

89 ms

default_print.min.css

default_print.min.css

14 ms

default_print.css

default_print.css

14 ms

Accessibility Review

raybar.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

raybar.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

raybar.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raybar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Raybar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

raybar.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ray Bar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: