2.9 sec in total
179 ms
2.4 sec
263 ms
Click here to check amazing Raymanpress content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about raymanpress.net
Visit raymanpress.netWe analyzed Raymanpress.net page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
raymanpress.net performance score
179 ms
66 ms
118 ms
1114 ms
1052 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Raymanpress.net, 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Raymanpress.net.
Page size can be reduced by 701.7 kB (55%)
1.3 MB
581.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Raymanpress.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 515.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Raymanpress needs image optimization as it can save up to 54.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 342.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 342.1 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 288.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Raymanpress.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 288.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (78%)
36
8
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Raymanpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
raymanpress.net
179 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
66 ms
lptw-recent-posts.css
118 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
1114 ms
contact_form_maker_frontend.css
1052 ms
style.css
1117 ms
css
32 ms
addtoany.min.css
75 ms
jquery.js
144 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
104 ms
js
44 ms
if_gmap_front_end.js
138 ms
cfm_main_front_end.js
149 ms
tinynav.js
172 ms
backtotop.js
174 ms
masonry.min.js
226 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
204 ms
lptw-recent-posts.js
1209 ms
widget.min.js
250 ms
effect.min.js
260 ms
effect-shake.min.js
277 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
318 ms
attitude-slider-setting.js
302 ms
wp-embed.min.js
326 ms
tumblr_lsg099XOzv1qjrx4po1_500.png
22 ms
body-bg.png
1071 ms
search.png
43 ms
tim-better-parenting.jpg
1115 ms
back-to-top.png
50 ms
page.js
23 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
22 ms
OttjxgcoEsufOGSINYBGLZ0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
29 ms
MZbhgk4S7dA
130 ms
iframe_api
24 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
27 ms
www-embed-player.js
47 ms
www-widgetapi.js
31 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
57 ms
ad_status.js
51 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
49 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
51 ms
raymanpress.net SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raymanpress.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Raymanpress.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
raymanpress.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Raymanpress. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: