Tools & Wizards About Us
raypak.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

raypak.com

Raypak – Raypak Pool & Spa, Residential and Commercial Hydronic Products –

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

41 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

249 ms

raypak.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to raypak.com homepage info - get ready to check Raypak best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about raypak.com

Raypak Pool & Spa, Residential and Commercial Hydronic Products -

Visit raypak.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Raypak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 41 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

raypak.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.2 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,910 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.108

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.9 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

raypak.com

41 ms

www.raypak.com

94 ms

uc.js

51 ms

formidableforms67.css

73 ms

blog.css

297 ms

Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Raypak.com, 17% (17 requests) were made to Media.raypak.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Raypak.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 546.4 kB (23%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Raypak.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 946.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 131.4 kB

  • Original 158.0 kB
  • After minification 154.8 kB
  • After compression 26.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 131.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 34.8 kB

  • Original 762.7 kB
  • After minification 727.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Raypak images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 175.7 kB

  • Original 946.8 kB
  • After minification 946.8 kB
  • After compression 771.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 175.7 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 204.5 kB

  • Original 461.4 kB
  • After minification 342.9 kB
  • After compression 256.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Raypak.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 204.5 kB or 44% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (81%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Raypak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

raypak.com

raypak.com

41 ms

www.raypak.com

www.raypak.com

94 ms

uc.js

uc.js

51 ms

formidableforms67.css

formidableforms67.css

73 ms

blog.css

blog.css

297 ms

hazel-foundations.css

hazel-foundations.css

288 ms

icons-font.css

icons-font.css

120 ms

fontawesome4.css

fontawesome4.css

218 ms

component.css

component.css

239 ms

selectWoo.min.css

selectWoo.min.css

278 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

343 ms

hazel-woo-layout.css

hazel-woo-layout.css

444 ms

hazel-woocommerce.css

hazel-woocommerce.css

310 ms

mb.YTPlayer.css

mb.YTPlayer.css

447 ms

retina.css

retina.css

347 ms

style.css

style.css

624 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

378 ms

styles.css

styles.css

404 ms

cf7-linkedlist.css

cf7-linkedlist.css

658 ms

style.css

style.css

439 ms

main.min-1.13.2.css

main.min-1.13.2.css

637 ms

widget.css

widget.css

534 ms

search-forms.css

search-forms.css

498 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

703 ms

style.css

style.css

702 ms

ultimate.min.css

ultimate.min.css

672 ms

R-Culture-of-Accountability.css

R-Culture-of-Accountability.css

216 ms

linearicons.css

linearicons.css

521 ms

IconMoonTransfer.css

IconMoonTransfer.css

485 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

802 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

859 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

741 ms

cf7-linkedlist.js

cf7-linkedlist.js

731 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

836 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

1074 ms

js

js

80 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

814 ms

ultimate.min.js

ultimate.min.js

840 ms

ultimate-params.min.js

ultimate-params.min.js

995 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

888 ms

css

css

66 ms

css

css

74 ms

css

css

83 ms

treethemes-cpt-frontend.css

treethemes-cpt-frontend.css

912 ms

hazel-custom.css

hazel-custom.css

1049 ms

css

css

84 ms

modernizr-custom3.6.0.min.js

modernizr-custom3.6.0.min.js

63 ms

api.js

api.js

64 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

922 ms

index.js

index.js

1008 ms

index.js

index.js

1129 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

1034 ms

treethemes-modernizr.js

treethemes-modernizr.js

1016 ms

waypoint.js

waypoint.js

997 ms

jquery.stellar.min.js

jquery.stellar.min.js

1036 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

952 ms

treethemes-isotope.js

treethemes-isotope.js

960 ms

queryLoader.js

queryLoader.js

1091 ms

jquery.dlmenu.js

jquery.dlmenu.js

1086 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

1045 ms

global.js

global.js

1023 ms

main.min-1.13.2.js

main.min-1.13.2.js

1060 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

989 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

1128 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

929 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1036 ms

index.js

index.js

976 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

832 ms

SmoothScroll.min.js

SmoothScroll.min.js

958 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

936 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

951 ms

ultimate_bg.min.js

ultimate_bg.min.js

915 ms

formidable.min.js

formidable.min.js

1055 ms

formidablepro.min.js

formidablepro.min.js

1084 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

244 ms

raypak-logo-white.png

raypak-logo-white.png

255 ms

aviaNitek.png

aviaNitek.png

449 ms

crosswindv.png

crosswindv.png

448 ms

xvers-Kor.png

xvers-Kor.png

546 ms

raymote.png

raymote.png

452 ms

raypak-logo-01.svg

raypak-logo-01.svg

446 ms

rheem.svg

rheem.svg

445 ms

ruud.svg

ruud.svg

590 ms

richmond.svg

richmond.svg

637 ms

htpg.svg

htpg.svg

611 ms

eemax.svg

eemax.svg

610 ms

eco.svg

eco.svg

968 ms

ibc.svg

ibc.svg

692 ms

Friedrich.svg

Friedrich.svg

769 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

766 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1118 ms

ionicons.ttf

ionicons.ttf

932 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

933 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

169 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

169 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

218 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

169 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

5 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

5 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

23 ms

recaptcha__de.js

recaptcha__de.js

35 ms

Accessibility Review

raypak.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

raypak.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

raypak.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raypak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Raypak.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

raypak.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Raypak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: