Tools & Wizards About Us
raytechind.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

raytechind.com

Plastic Injection Molding and Blow Molding - Advanced Technology in Custom Manufacturing.Raytech Industries

Page Load Speed

660 ms in total

First Response

63 ms

Resources Loaded

475 ms

Page Rendered

122 ms

raytechind.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Raytech Ind content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about raytechind.com

We are a full service provider of high-quality, low-cost plastic injection mold tooling, custom plastic injected parts and blow molded bottles.

Visit raytechind.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Raytechind.com page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 597 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

raytechind.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

raytechind.com

63 ms

raytechind.com

48 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

26 ms

testimonials-widget.css

31 ms

testimonials-widget-premium.css

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Raytechind.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (237 ms) relates to the external source Heartcode-canvasloader.googlecode.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 84.0 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Raytechind.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 519.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 37.9 kB

  • Original 49.6 kB
  • After minification 48.9 kB
  • After compression 11.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 138 B

  • Original 519.0 kB
  • After minification 518.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Raytech Ind images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 26.3 kB

  • Original 426.7 kB
  • After minification 426.7 kB
  • After compression 400.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 19.8 kB

  • Original 133.8 kB
  • After minification 131.3 kB
  • After compression 114.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Raytechind.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.8 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (82%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Raytech Ind. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

raytechind.com

raytechind.com

63 ms

raytechind.com

raytechind.com

48 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

26 ms

testimonials-widget.css

testimonials-widget.css

31 ms

testimonials-widget-premium.css

testimonials-widget-premium.css

36 ms

testimonials-widget-premium-form.css

testimonials-widget-premium-form.css

29 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

32 ms

styles.css

styles.css

26 ms

jquery.qtip.min.css

jquery.qtip.min.css

53 ms

default.css

default.css

49 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

45 ms

css

css

35 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

43 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

50 ms

grid-system.css

grid-system.css

53 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

60 ms

animate.css

animate.css

61 ms

main.css

main.css

66 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

79 ms

widgets.css

widgets.css

77 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

63 ms

icomoon.css

icomoon.css

73 ms

media.php

media.php

99 ms

style.css

style.css

85 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

86 ms

jquery-1.12.4-wp.js

jquery-1.12.4-wp.js

106 ms

jquery-migrate-1.4.1-wp.js

jquery-migrate-1.4.1-wp.js

116 ms

iphorm.js

iphorm.js

115 ms

revolution.tools.min.js

revolution.tools.min.js

116 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

150 ms

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

155 ms

js

js

45 ms

wpgmappity-post-styles.css

wpgmappity-post-styles.css

155 ms

css

css

30 ms

css

css

31 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

147 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

209 ms

jquery.fileupload.min.js

jquery.fileupload.min.js

208 ms

jquery.iphorm.js

jquery.iphorm.js

208 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

216 ms

jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js

jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js

214 ms

heartcode-canvasloader-min-0.9.1.js

heartcode-canvasloader-min-0.9.1.js

237 ms

jquery.qtip.min.js

jquery.qtip.min.js

216 ms

jquery.uniform.min.js

jquery.uniform.min.js

203 ms

jquery.infieldlabel.min.js

jquery.infieldlabel.min.js

202 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

200 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

199 ms

jquery.inview.min.js

jquery.inview.min.js

212 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

213 ms

jquery.parallax.min.js

jquery.parallax.min.js

204 ms

circle-progress.js

circle-progress.js

202 ms

fittext.min.js

fittext.min.js

201 ms

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

197 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

205 ms

cd-google-map.js

cd-google-map.js

205 ms

jpreloader.js

jpreloader.js

198 ms

main.js

main.js

197 ms

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

194 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

185 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

182 ms

zozo.tabs.min.js

zozo.tabs.min.js

181 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

175 ms

packery-mode.pkgd.min.js

packery-mode.pkgd.min.js

174 ms

midnight.jquery.min.js

midnight.jquery.min.js

154 ms

jquery.iosslider.min.js

jquery.iosslider.min.js

155 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

146 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

144 ms

menu_header_background_011.png

menu_header_background_011.png

55 ms

raytech_logo_03.png

raytech_logo_03.png

54 ms

menu-btn.png

menu-btn.png

53 ms

slider_013.jpg

slider_013.jpg

54 ms

slider_02_01.jpg

slider_02_01.jpg

52 ms

slider_02_021.png

slider_02_021.png

55 ms

slider_02_032.png

slider_02_032.png

51 ms

slider_02_041.png

slider_02_041.png

50 ms

slider_02_051.png

slider_02_051.png

49 ms

slider_02_061.png

slider_02_061.png

48 ms

slider_02_071.png

slider_02_071.png

45 ms

raytech_logo_footer1.png

raytech_logo_footer1.png

98 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

44 ms

back_to_top.png

back_to_top.png

95 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

80 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

85 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

87 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

93 ms

menu_header_background_011.png

menu_header_background_011.png

91 ms

file-upload-tick.png

file-upload-tick.png

46 ms

captcha-refresh-icon.png

captcha-refresh-icon.png

25 ms

default-loading.gif

default-loading.gif

20 ms

error.png

error.png

34 ms

success.png

success.png

26 ms

raytech_logo_footer1.png

raytech_logo_footer1.png

37 ms

Accessibility Review

raytechind.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

raytechind.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

raytechind.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raytechind.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Raytechind.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

raytechind.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Raytech Ind. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: