7.8 sec in total
333 ms
6.9 sec
503 ms
Click here to check amazing RAZGO content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about razgo.net
Web Design & Programming Studio. We create websites & online stores with responsive designs, combining creative talent and extensive experience.
Visit razgo.netWe analyzed Razgo.net page load time and found that the first response time was 333 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
razgo.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value21.4 s
0/100
25%
Value13.3 s
2/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value12.7 s
13/100
10%
333 ms
1640 ms
119 ms
234 ms
321 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Razgo.net, 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Razgo.net.
Page size can be reduced by 232.0 kB (6%)
3.9 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Razgo.net main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 72.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 105.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RAZGO images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 25.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 28.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Razgo.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 28% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (47%)
83
44
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RAZGO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
razgo.net
333 ms
1640 ms
style.min.css
119 ms
rs6.css
234 ms
style.min.css
321 ms
reset.css
323 ms
wordpress.css
326 ms
animation.css
330 ms
modulobox.css
334 ms
custom.css
348 ms
flexslider.css
441 ms
tooltipster.css
438 ms
odometer-theme-minimal.css
437 ms
hw-parallax.css
443 ms
progressive-image.css
448 ms
screen.css
577 ms
leftalignmenu.css
552 ms
css
33 ms
font-awesome.min.css
549 ms
themify-icons.css
551 ms
custom-css.css
556 ms
admin-ajax.php
1397 ms
css
32 ms
jquery.min.js
766 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
662 ms
rbtools.min.js
889 ms
rs6.min.js
804 ms
css
33 ms
script.min.js
773 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.js
776 ms
jquery.requestAnimationFrame.js
878 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
888 ms
jquery.easing.js
890 ms
waypoints.min.js
919 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
989 ms
hw-parallax.js
999 ms
modulobox.js
1007 ms
custom_plugins.js
1002 ms
custom.js
1034 ms
custom_onepage.js
1102 ms
jquery.validate.js
999 ms
contact.js
892 ms
ga.js
17 ms
RAZGO_logo_black.png
191 ms
RAZGO_logo.png
190 ms
RAZGO_Slider_01-scaled.jpg
678 ms
RAZGO_Slider_06-scaled.jpg
888 ms
RAZGO_Slider_05-1-scaled.jpg
632 ms
RAZGO_Slider_02-scaled.jpg
544 ms
RAZGO_Servicios_01.jpg
304 ms
RAZGO_Servicios_03-1.jpg
409 ms
RAZGO_Servicios_02.jpg
419 ms
RAZGO_Servicios_04.jpg
628 ms
RAZGO_Servicios_05.jpg
534 ms
RAZGO_Servicios_06.jpg
650 ms
logo_XMarquitectura.png
658 ms
logo_Peraire_Inmobiliaria-1.png
748 ms
logo_Ceballos_Pinar_Inmo.png
749 ms
logo_Mobil_M-1.png
764 ms
logo_Art_Arquitectura.png
773 ms
logo_GOZAR_Magazine_ok.png
793 ms
logo_Berta_Eerrando_ok.png
856 ms
logo_Tugaleria360_ok.png
858 ms
logo_GOZAR_Gallery_ok.png
880 ms
logo_Wylsum_Gallery_ok.png
888 ms
logo_Klassik_Magazine.png
905 ms
logo_Riptide_Communications.png
969 ms
logo_Hithisis_Barcelona.png
968 ms
logo_Cinetools-1.png
994 ms
logo_Espiarva.png
1003 ms
logo_Ajuntament_Barcelona.png
1002 ms
logo_Arxiu_Fotografic.png
1018 ms
logo_Generalitat_Catalunya.png
1081 ms
logo_Nestle_Health_Science.png
1083 ms
logo_Fresenius_Kabi.png
1110 ms
logo_Musikeon.png
1116 ms
logo_Sibetrans.png
1118 ms
logo_Razzmatazz.png
1130 ms
logo_The_Loft-1.png
1196 ms
__utm.gif
39 ms
5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4AQ.ttf
108 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfMJaERySiA.ttf
145 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfLZcERySiA.ttf
145 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfNJdERySiA.ttf
154 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
154 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
154 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
155 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
153 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf
98 ms
RAZGO_Slider_04-scaled.jpg
745 ms
RAZGO_Proceso-scaled.jpg
873 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1119 ms
logo_Mond_Club-1.png
1043 ms
modulobox.svg
932 ms
loader.gif
830 ms
razgo.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
razgo.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
razgo.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Razgo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Razgo.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
razgo.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RAZGO. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: