Tools & Wizards About Us
razorjam.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

razorjam.co.uk

Razor - Technology & Data Analytics Consultancy

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

19 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

542 ms

razorjam.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Razor Jam content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about razorjam.co.uk

Razor brings you technology that works in the real world, now and for the future. Find out what we do to amplify the greatness of humanity.

Visit razorjam.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Razorjam.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 19 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

razorjam.co.uk performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

25/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,570 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.056

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

razorjam.co.uk

19 ms

www.razor.co.uk

480 ms

embed.min.js

70 ms

classic-071822.css

30 ms

app.4ee61049.js

128 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Razorjam.co.uk, 27% (14 requests) were made to A.storyblok.com and 25% (13 requests) were made to Razor.co.uk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (586 ms) relates to the external source Razor.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 266.3 kB (11%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Razorjam.co.uk main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 42.5 kB

  • Original 54.5 kB
  • After minification 54.5 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 194.3 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Razor Jam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 93.5 kB
  • After minification 93.5 kB
  • After compression 86.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 22.2 kB

  • Original 23.5 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Razorjam.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.2 kB or 94% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (31%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Razor Jam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

razorjam.co.uk

razorjam.co.uk

19 ms

www.razor.co.uk

www.razor.co.uk

480 ms

embed.min.js

embed.min.js

70 ms

classic-071822.css

classic-071822.css

30 ms

app.4ee61049.js

app.4ee61049.js

128 ms

style.9d05f90e.css

style.9d05f90e.css

148 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

23 ms

4877059.js

4877059.js

50 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

60 ms

css2

css2

31 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

118 ms

hotjar-3194398.js

hotjar-3194398.js

133 ms

174 ms

rr-flourish-01.svg

rr-flourish-01.svg

148 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

160 ms

rr-flourish-02.svg

rr-flourish-02.svg

152 ms

link-arrow.svg

link-arrow.svg

144 ms

noise.png

noise.png

218 ms

dots-flourish.svg

dots-flourish.svg

247 ms

razor-logo-primary.svg

razor-logo-primary.svg

141 ms

misblk_alt1.jpg

misblk_alt1.jpg

271 ms

microsoft-partner.png

microsoft-partner.png

586 ms

amrc-logo.svg

amrc-logo.svg

266 ms

149 ms

167 ms

205 ms

206 ms

165 ms

205 ms

205 ms

204 ms

205 ms

mip.svg

mip.svg

225 ms

dataqi-logo-v2.png

dataqi-logo-v2.png

224 ms

docqi-visual-3.png

docqi-visual-3.png

225 ms

best-workplace-for-wellbeing.png

best-workplace-for-wellbeing.png

253 ms

lftracker_v1_kn9Eq4RwMpzaRlvP.js

lftracker_v1_kn9Eq4RwMpzaRlvP.js

153 ms

fb.js

fb.js

166 ms

4877059.js

4877059.js

202 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

203 ms

banner.js

banner.js

204 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

161 ms

i7dPIFZifjKcF5UAWdDRUEZ2Qlq6.ttf

i7dPIFZifjKcF5UAWdDRUEZ2Qlq6.ttf

85 ms

i7dMIFZifjKcF5UAWdDRaPpZYFKQGQyU.ttf

i7dMIFZifjKcF5UAWdDRaPpZYFKQGQyU.ttf

127 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

167 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

167 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

168 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

165 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

154 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

173 ms

tr-rc.lfeeder.com

tr-rc.lfeeder.com

35 ms

Accessibility Review

razorjam.co.uk accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

razorjam.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

razorjam.co.uk SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Razorjam.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Razorjam.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

razorjam.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Razor Jam. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: