1.4 sec in total
82 ms
1.1 sec
184 ms
Visit razorsmile.com now to see the best up-to-date Razor Smile content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about razorsmile.com
Established in 2001, at the height of the dot com boom, Razor Smile set out with the aim of challenging traditional web design concepts. Razor Smile has established its position in the market, becomin...
Visit razorsmile.comWe analyzed Razorsmile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
razorsmile.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
87/100
10%
Value4.4 s
38/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value640 ms
46/100
30%
Value0.065
97/100
15%
Value5.9 s
66/100
10%
82 ms
358 ms
169 ms
159 ms
135 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Razorsmile.com, 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (552 ms) belongs to the original domain Razorsmile.com.
Page size can be reduced by 30.0 kB (4%)
713.3 kB
683.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Razorsmile.com main page is 713.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 513.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.8 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Razor Smile images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 0 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Razorsmile.com has all CSS files already compressed.
We found no issues to fix!
24
24
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Razor Smile. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
razorsmile.com
82 ms
razorsmile.com
358 ms
css_xsh-IA2qZeuwrNH-iqkQy_ht8SAfFPbAktISjm04-X8.css
169 ms
css_rwcfRuRTimMc3VfXudV3rWuJTwbzjkOGnplGPR-gaY4.css
159 ms
logo.png
135 ms
safe-dial.png.webp
289 ms
light-bulb.png.webp
133 ms
condom.png.webp
187 ms
icon-web-design.svg
287 ms
icon-graphic-design.svg
285 ms
icon-photography.svg
297 ms
icon-marketing.svg
291 ms
detectnology-logo.png.webp
296 ms
excalon-logo.png.webp
401 ms
milk4life-logo.png.webp
404 ms
guardpost-logo.png.webp
414 ms
supreme-blinds-and-interiors-logo.png.webp
413 ms
view-finance-logo.png.webp
416 ms
lindale-recovery-logo.png.webp
415 ms
combat-19-logo.png.webp
526 ms
gracebridge-care-logo.png.webp
528 ms
leisuresec-plc-logo.png.webp
527 ms
false-teeth.png
552 ms
rocket-loader.min.js
373 ms
slick.woff
251 ms
js
52 ms
js_U66XuAotC1ot_4lWq_adI2aetSSW3w3yJloC1UUS-D4.js
150 ms
razorsmile.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
razorsmile.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
razorsmile.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Razorsmile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Razorsmile.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
razorsmile.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Razor Smile. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: