Tools & Wizards About Us
rbaknoxville.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

rbaknoxville.com

Window and Door Replacement Experts | Renewal By Andersen

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

222 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

0 ms

rbaknoxville.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rbaknoxville.com homepage info - get ready to check Rbaknoxville best content for Romania right away, or after learning these important things about rbaknoxville.com

Request a free window and door consultation with replacement experts at Renewal by Andersen today! Over 100 years of experience. Call today!

Visit rbaknoxville.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rbaknoxville.com page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rbaknoxville.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,620 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.windowdoor.com

222 ms

style.min.css

17 ms

pagenavi-css.css

34 ms

header.css

36 ms

footer.css

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Rbaknoxville.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (222 ms) relates to the external source Windowdoor.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 128.3 kB (14%)

Content Size

891.2 kB

After Optimization

762.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Rbaknoxville.com main page is 891.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 643.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 128.1 kB

  • Original 162.1 kB
  • After minification 162.0 kB
  • After compression 34.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 643.9 kB
  • After minification 643.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rbaknoxville images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 222 B

  • Original 85.2 kB
  • After minification 85.2 kB
  • After compression 85.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (91%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rbaknoxville. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.windowdoor.com

www.windowdoor.com

222 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

17 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

34 ms

header.css

header.css

36 ms

footer.css

footer.css

35 ms

cf7.css

cf7.css

33 ms

style.css

style.css

33 ms

search-forms.css

search-forms.css

33 ms

image-text-box.css

image-text-box.css

45 ms

contained-image-text.css

contained-image-text.css

40 ms

wysiwyg.css

wysiwyg.css

42 ms

half-image-text.css

half-image-text.css

42 ms

slick.css

slick.css

42 ms

slick.css

slick.css

43 ms

full-width-image-text.css

full-width-image-text.css

49 ms

gallery.css

gallery.css

51 ms

half-map-text.css

half-map-text.css

52 ms

reviews.css

reviews.css

53 ms

logo-carousel.css

logo-carousel.css

55 ms

cards.css

cards.css

51 ms

trumps.css

trumps.css

58 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

97 ms

choices.css

choices.css

96 ms

choices.css

choices.css

98 ms

styles.css

styles.css

94 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

97 ms

api.js

api.js

94 ms

index.js

index.js

95 ms

js

js

128 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

96 ms

css2

css2

50 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

105 ms

mcfx.js

mcfx.js

121 ms

hero-home-scaled.jpg

hero-home-scaled.jpg

46 ms

jizOREVItHgc8qDIbSTKq4XkRg8T88bjFuXOnduhLsWUBA.woff

jizOREVItHgc8qDIbSTKq4XkRg8T88bjFuXOnduhLsWUBA.woff

47 ms

jizOREVItHgc8qDIbSTKq4XkRg8T88bjFuXOnduhycKUBA.woff

jizOREVItHgc8qDIbSTKq4XkRg8T88bjFuXOnduhycKUBA.woff

58 ms

print.css

print.css

21 ms

Accessibility Review

rbaknoxville.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rbaknoxville.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rbaknoxville.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rbaknoxville.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rbaknoxville.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rbaknoxville.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rbaknoxville. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: