4.3 sec in total
340 ms
2.8 sec
1.2 sec
Welcome to rbforum.net homepage info - get ready to check RBForum best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about rbforum.net
Visit rbforum.netWe analyzed Rbforum.net page load time and found that the first response time was 340 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
rbforum.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value22.7 s
0/100
25%
Value13.2 s
2/100
10%
Value4,150 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.251
49/100
15%
Value24.6 s
0/100
10%
340 ms
477 ms
238 ms
164 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 120 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Rbforum.net, 27% (32 requests) were made to Google.com and 10% (12 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rbforum.net.
Page size can be reduced by 977.3 kB (40%)
2.4 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Rbforum.net main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.2 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RBForum images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 728.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 728.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 178.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rbforum.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 178.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (35%)
107
70
The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RBForum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rbforum.net
340 ms
bootstrap.css
477 ms
style.css
238 ms
slideshow.css
164 ms
css
25 ms
font-awesome.css
243 ms
redirection-mobile.js
173 ms
modernizr.custom.26633.js
160 ms
jquery.min.js
504 ms
bootstrap.js
430 ms
jquery.gridrotator.js
413 ms
custom.js
331 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
328 ms
stickUp.js
491 ms
jquery.isotope.js
656 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.css
638 ms
lightbox.min.css
562 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
587 ms
jquery.ui.rlightbox.js
872 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
658 ms
jquery.easypiechart.js
719 ms
jquery.contact.js
753 ms
Responsive.css
631 ms
maps
132 ms
BG-Banner.jpg
394 ms
LogoEvent.png
171 ms
2016-IA.png
319 ms
2015Post.png
321 ms
SPK1.jpg
169 ms
SPK3.jpg
206 ms
SPK4.jpg
322 ms
SPK5.jpg
322 ms
SPK6.jpg
370 ms
SPK7.jpg
480 ms
SPK8.jpg
481 ms
SPK9.jpg
478 ms
SPK10.jpg
486 ms
SPK11.jpg
527 ms
SPK12.jpg
549 ms
SPK13.jpg
636 ms
SPK20.jpg
640 ms
SPK19.jpg
638 ms
SPK17.jpg
671 ms
SPK18.jpg
686 ms
SPK22.jpg
709 ms
SPK23.jpg
849 ms
SPK24.jpg
851 ms
SPK25.jpg
850 ms
SPK26.jpg
852 ms
SPK27.jpg
905 ms
Programme.png
1054 ms
PMU.jpg
960 ms
IFHA.jpg
1054 ms
Sportech.jpg
1051 ms
Carrus.png
1054 ms
Salle.jpg
1087 ms
map-bro.png
1128 ms
BlocBas.png
1291 ms
embed
436 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
29 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
38 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
54 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
53 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
45 ms
js
81 ms
init_embed.js
66 ms
common.js
50 ms
map.js
51 ms
google4.png
88 ms
overlay.js
13 ms
util.js
91 ms
onion.js
83 ms
search_impl.js
85 ms
stats.js
51 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
59 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
256 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
44 ms
kh
80 ms
transparent.png
40 ms
controls.js
45 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
22 ms
css
107 ms
entity11.png
80 ms
mapcnt6.png
71 ms
tmapctrl.png
42 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
82 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
92 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
101 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
111 ms
vt
154 ms
vt
143 ms
vt
172 ms
vt
90 ms
vt
107 ms
vt
136 ms
vt
187 ms
vt
180 ms
vt
224 ms
vt
226 ms
vt
210 ms
vt
271 ms
vt
263 ms
vt
320 ms
vt
309 ms
vt
305 ms
vt
306 ms
vt
396 ms
vt
365 ms
vt
371 ms
vt
390 ms
vt
417 ms
vt
415 ms
vt
442 ms
vt
430 ms
vt
474 ms
vt
480 ms
vt
504 ms
vt
484 ms
vt
511 ms
vt
508 ms
rbforum.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
rbforum.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
rbforum.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rbforum.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rbforum.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rbforum.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RBForum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: