1.7 sec in total
407 ms
1.1 sec
172 ms
Click here to check amazing Rbl content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rbl.net
At The RBL Group, we develop custom leadership, HR and organization solutions that increase stakeholder confidence and create extraordinary value.
Visit rbl.netWe analyzed Rbl.net page load time and found that the first response time was 407 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
rbl.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value19.1 s
0/100
25%
Value6.8 s
34/100
10%
Value5,010 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value18.5 s
3/100
10%
407 ms
32 ms
159 ms
236 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Rbl.net, 14% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (407 ms) belongs to the original domain Rbl.net.
Page size can be reduced by 536.5 kB (65%)
819.7 kB
283.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Rbl.net main page is 819.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 474.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 85.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rbl needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 293.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 293.7 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 144.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rbl.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 144.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (53%)
47
22
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rbl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rbl.net
407 ms
2217611776.js
32 ms
index.php
159 ms
index.php
236 ms
css
27 ms
5d0d8dba-4e9c-4a95-af0f-0832ec7a03dd.css
132 ms
jquery-1.8.2.min.js
364 ms
modernizr.js
148 ms
shadowbox-upgrade.js
225 ms
browser-detector.js
149 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
219 ms
html-header.css
222 ms
html-header.js
224 ms
index.css
291 ms
header.css
294 ms
header.js
298 ms
shadowbox-login-form.css
297 ms
shadowbox-login-form.js
301 ms
shadowbox-create-account-form.css
379 ms
shadowbox-create-account-form.js
378 ms
footer.css
320 ms
conversion.js
17 ms
swap.js
97 ms
uIcm3s8aEeObPyIACmOLpg.js
28 ms
index.php
91 ms
new-text-logo.png
102 ms
form-frozen.gif
103 ms
blue-check-mark.png
104 ms
gtm.js
100 ms
small-search-icon.png
86 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
10 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
15 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
32 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
31 ms
x-button.png
93 ms
red-nav-arrow-left.png
101 ms
red-nav-arrow-right.png
202 ms
consult-devel-assess-980x300.jpg
201 ms
small-blue-arrow.png
201 ms
mentor-icons.png
230 ms
social-buttons-roll.png
231 ms
social-buttons.png
229 ms
twitter-roll.png
183 ms
facebook-roll.png
183 ms
phone-roll.png
182 ms
email-roll.png
230 ms
footer-email-hover.png
230 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
18 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxh_xHqYgAV9Bl_ZQbYUxnQU.woff
17 ms
analytics.js
13 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xF1YPouZEKgzpqZW9wN-3Ek.woff
28 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xONSK5BxN3NFS4EJkViHIqo.woff
28 ms
141 ms
collect
17 ms
2818.js
46 ms
collect
17 ms
31 ms
collect
61 ms
collect
66 ms
rbl.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
rbl.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
rbl.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rbl.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rbl.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rbl.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rbl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: