Tools & Wizards About Us
rctgo.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

rctgo.com

RCTgo - The largest collection of RCT downloads on the web

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

39 ms

Resources Loaded

815 ms

Page Rendered

400 ms

rctgo.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RCTgo content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rctgo.com

Thousands of downloads for RollerCoaster Tycoon 3, RCT2, RCT, and NoLimits. Share yours!

Visit rctgo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rctgo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 39 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rctgo.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,230 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rctgo.com

39 ms

rctgo.com

176 ms

main.css

15 ms

js

264 ms

adsbygoogle.js

284 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Rctgo.com, 57% (25 requests) were made to Thumbs.rctgo.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (301 ms) relates to the external source Thumbs.rctgo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 732.6 kB (11%)

Content Size

6.7 MB

After Optimization

5.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rctgo.com main page is 6.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 32.1 kB

  • Original 38.2 kB
  • After minification 36.1 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 700.2 kB

  • Original 6.3 MB
  • After minification 5.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RCTgo needs image optimization as it can save up to 700.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 209 B

  • Original 291.4 kB
  • After minification 291.4 kB
  • After compression 291.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 20 B

  • Original 19.2 kB
  • After minification 19.2 kB
  • After compression 19.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rctgo.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (21%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RCTgo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rctgo.com

rctgo.com

39 ms

rctgo.com

rctgo.com

176 ms

main.css

main.css

15 ms

js

js

264 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

284 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

39 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

28 ms

main.js

main.js

34 ms

css

css

35 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

11 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

20 ms

5bb1916e9b560.png

5bb1916e9b560.png

301 ms

logo.png

logo.png

231 ms

350x240.gif

350x240.gif

77 ms

footer_logo.png

footer_logo.png

76 ms

666b6824a9ff5.png

666b6824a9ff5.png

98 ms

666b15c6cb69e.png

666b15c6cb69e.png

109 ms

666a8415bd3e1.png

666a8415bd3e1.png

179 ms

666a398bab2a2.png

666a398bab2a2.png

109 ms

666a160430c9b.png

666a160430c9b.png

134 ms

6668af7626b05.png

6668af7626b05.png

110 ms

66659c4b2a307.png

66659c4b2a307.png

100 ms

666594d393e50.png

666594d393e50.png

110 ms

666592a0759c2.jpeg

666592a0759c2.jpeg

123 ms

6664fed8bf4df.png

6664fed8bf4df.png

128 ms

6664940a5e36a.png

6664940a5e36a.png

121 ms

6664871592af9.png

6664871592af9.png

121 ms

666451e5ca98f.png

666451e5ca98f.png

130 ms

666451493fc08.png

666451493fc08.png

130 ms

6664508bed707.png

6664508bed707.png

132 ms

66644fe19ec26.png

66644fe19ec26.png

141 ms

6663e829d7524.png

6663e829d7524.png

142 ms

6663a94820834.png

6663a94820834.png

140 ms

666371b31f5c0.png

666371b31f5c0.png

158 ms

6662352cb07f1.png

6662352cb07f1.png

143 ms

6661f827b6f30.png

6661f827b6f30.png

149 ms

6661b84bdd9f2.png

6661b84bdd9f2.png

154 ms

665a2969d247e.png

665a2969d247e.png

166 ms

665faf30e9a52.png

665faf30e9a52.png

158 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

82 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

94 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

95 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

73 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

242 ms

Accessibility Review

rctgo.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rctgo.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rctgo.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rctgo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rctgo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rctgo.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RCTgo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: