5.5 sec in total
948 ms
2.2 sec
2.4 sec
Visit rcwlightning.com now to see the best up-to-date Rcwlightning content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rcwlightning.com
Visit rcwlightning.comWe analyzed Rcwlightning.com page load time and found that the first response time was 948 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
rcwlightning.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0.8 s
100/100
25%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
Value190 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.214
58/100
15%
Value3.2 s
94/100
10%
948 ms
103 ms
100 ms
68 ms
71 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Rcwlightning.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (948 ms) belongs to the original domain Rcwlightning.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (36%)
3.9 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Rcwlightning.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 56.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rcwlightning images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 824.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 824.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 453.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rcwlightning.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 453.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (48%)
84
44
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rcwlightning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rcwlightning.com
948 ms
minimalist.min.css
103 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
100 ms
bootstrap.css
68 ms
crrstylebar.css
71 ms
evs.css
73 ms
public.css
130 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
138 ms
wp.css
139 ms
style.min.css
214 ms
default.min.css
381 ms
jquery.js
252 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
190 ms
jquery-ui.js
420 ms
jquery.lwtCountdown-1.0.js
200 ms
jquery.noconflict.min.js
253 ms
jquery.loadScript.min.js
263 ms
flowplayer.min.js
309 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
372 ms
video-audio-player.min.js
321 ms
crrtopbotbar.js
326 ms
public.js
375 ms
exit_redirect.min.js
435 ms
css
24 ms
144 ms
css
14 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
350 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.min.js
401 ms
comment-reply.min.js
370 ms
menus.min.js
363 ms
tooltipster.min.js
370 ms
selectnav.min.js
399 ms
dropkick.min.js
399 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js
477 ms
jquery.sharrre-1.3.4.min.js
473 ms
jquery.reveal.min.js
473 ms
countdown.min.js
474 ms
global.min.js
475 ms
logo.png
258 ms
rcwbg.jpg
259 ms
High-Quality-Article.jpg
254 ms
PostContent.jpg
255 ms
Promote.jpg
254 ms
newputerrcwl1.jpg
376 ms
CaseStudy2-9451.jpg
298 ms
CaseStudy1.jpg
296 ms
StudentResults.jpg
375 ms
silo.5.jpg
296 ms
Drag-and-Drop1.jpg
425 ms
monet6.jpg
425 ms
Product-Review-Posts.jpg
426 ms
Niche-Report.jpg
427 ms
EBook.jpg
427 ms
VideoBlog.jpg
439 ms
InfoGraphic.jpg
449 ms
QuestionAndAnswers.jpg
462 ms
MixMatch.jpg
440 ms
database.jpg
476 ms
247docs7.jpg
505 ms
bulkcration.jpg
519 ms
fanpage.jpg
526 ms
socialmedia.1.jpg
546 ms
fbtimelinercwl.jpg
556 ms
tshirts4.jpg
572 ms
exportstuff.jpg
598 ms
assets.js
108 ms
worksonwordpress.jpg
576 ms
verified.jpg
597 ms
rcwlite1.jpg
686 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
74 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
75 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
77 ms
testimonials.png
793 ms
testimonials21.jpg
683 ms
guarantee.png
775 ms
paypal-1.png
565 ms
visa-1.png
583 ms
amex-1.png
632 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
126 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
127 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
126 ms
animate.min.php
61 ms
evs.css
116 ms
widgets.js
46 ms
all.js
45 ms
mastercard-1.png
510 ms
discover-1.png
534 ms
secureordering.jpg
586 ms
macpc.jpg
601 ms
q-icon.png
594 ms
11.png
567 ms
rcwlightning.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rcwlightning.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
rcwlightning.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rcwlightning.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rcwlightning.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rcwlightning.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rcwlightning. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: