3.1 sec in total
177 ms
1.6 sec
1.3 sec
Visit rczm.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date RCZM content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rczm.co.uk
for architectural performance design using environmental impact, low carbon, simulation and post-occupancy analysis
Visit rczm.co.ukWe analyzed Rczm.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 177 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
rczm.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value5.2 s
24/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value590 ms
50/100
30%
Value0.166
71/100
15%
Value6.5 s
59/100
10%
177 ms
74 ms
73 ms
82 ms
71 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (93 requests) were addressed to the original Rczm.co.uk, 2% (2 requests) were made to Count.carrierzone.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (896 ms) belongs to the original domain Rczm.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (11%)
14.6 MB
13.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Rczm.co.uk main page is 14.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 14.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.8 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RCZM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 83.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 83.0 kB or 36% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rczm.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (34%)
98
65
The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RCZM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rczm.co.uk
177 ms
all-stylesheet.css
74 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
73 ms
bootstrap.min.js
82 ms
jquery.appear.js
71 ms
contact-form.js
67 ms
ekko-lightbox.js
67 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
95 ms
custom-isotope.js
99 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
181 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.js
211 ms
owl.carousel.js
106 ms
custom.js
116 ms
script.js
125 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
129 ms
jquery.nav.js
138 ms
jquery.sticky.js
148 ms
jquery.donutchart.js
155 ms
SmoothScroll.js
162 ms
retina.js
171 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
177 ms
count.js
222 ms
css
16 ms
bootstrap.min.css
239 ms
stylesheet.css
216 ms
hide-show.css
180 ms
animate.min.css
245 ms
ekko-lightbox.css
188 ms
font-awesome.css
234 ms
font-awesome.min.css
224 ms
owl.carousel.css
218 ms
owl.theme.css
249 ms
isotope-style.css
250 ms
settings.css
299 ms
analytics.js
75 ms
progress.gif
58 ms
1.jpg
606 ms
transparent.png
59 ms
logo-big.png
57 ms
timer.png
59 ms
light-grey-noise.gif
58 ms
8.jpg
134 ms
2.jpg
134 ms
3.jpg
288 ms
4.jpg
288 ms
5.jpg
287 ms
6.jpg
290 ms
7.jpg
289 ms
1.jpg
366 ms
2.jpg
290 ms
3.jpg
293 ms
1.jpg
774 ms
001.png
374 ms
002.png
647 ms
003.png
759 ms
004.png
640 ms
006.png
624 ms
007.png
713 ms
008.png
754 ms
009.png
724 ms
010.png
751 ms
011.png
772 ms
012.png
756 ms
013.png
807 ms
014.png
809 ms
015.png
815 ms
016.png
896 ms
3.jpg
853 ms
1.jpg
814 ms
2.jpg
841 ms
3.jpg
794 ms
4.jpg
793 ms
1.png
801 ms
2.png
872 ms
3.png
840 ms
font
225 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
820 ms
collect
211 ms
4.png
766 ms
ctin.php
126 ms
5.png
657 ms
collect
104 ms
js
127 ms
6.png
649 ms
7.png
639 ms
1.png
639 ms
2.png
638 ms
3.png
656 ms
4.png
662 ms
5.png
622 ms
6.png
584 ms
7.png
592 ms
ga-audiences
48 ms
8.png
367 ms
9.png
350 ms
2.jpg
407 ms
4.jpg
338 ms
loader.gif
271 ms
gridtile.png
271 ms
bullet.png
250 ms
large_left.png
250 ms
large_right.png
257 ms
rczm.co.uk accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rczm.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rczm.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rczm.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rczm.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rczm.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RCZM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: