4.5 sec in total
1.8 sec
2.4 sec
234 ms
Click here to check amazing R Dingwall content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rdingwall.com
I build trading systems for investment banks.
Visit rdingwall.comWe analyzed Rdingwall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
rdingwall.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0.8 s
100/100
25%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
1794 ms
69 ms
136 ms
166 ms
172 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Rdingwall.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Rdingwall.com.
Page size can be reduced by 357.4 kB (68%)
525.2 kB
167.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Rdingwall.com main page is 525.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 337.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. R Dingwall images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 230.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 230.1 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rdingwall.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 110.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (76%)
25
6
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of R Dingwall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rdingwall.com
1794 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
69 ms
wp-filebase.css
136 ms
font-awesome.min.css
166 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
172 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
170 ms
style.css
132 ms
jetpack.css
150 ms
jquery.js
322 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
198 ms
spin.js
221 ms
jquery.spin.js
229 ms
external-tracking.min.js
232 ms
infinity.js
238 ms
jquery.cycle.js
359 ms
slideshow-shortcode.js
285 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
384 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
296 ms
wp-embed.min.js
302 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
ga.js
15 ms
135 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
264 ms
__utm.gif
100 ms
g.gif
4 ms
rdingwall.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
rdingwall.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
rdingwall.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rdingwall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rdingwall.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rdingwall.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of R Dingwall. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: