Tools & Wizards About Us
rdrct.cc screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

rdrct.cc

Retarget users from any link you share - AffiliatePoints

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

206 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

479 ms

rdrct.cc screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rdrct.cc homepage info - get ready to check Rdrct best content for Italy right away, or after learning these important things about rdrct.cc

With AffiliatePoints you can retarget users that visits any link you share, even not yours. Insert your pixel between your shorten urls and destination links.

Visit rdrct.cc

Key Findings

We analyzed Rdrct.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rdrct.cc performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.6 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,960 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rdrct.cc

206 ms

www.affiliatespoint.com

172 ms

css

40 ms

bootstrap.css

417 ms

style.css

129 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rdrct.cc, 72% (31 requests) were made to Affiliatespoint.com and 14% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (496 ms) relates to the external source Affiliatespoint.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 56.5 kB (7%)

Content Size

774.2 kB

After Optimization

717.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rdrct.cc main page is 774.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 625.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 16.2 kB

  • Original 21.1 kB
  • After minification 18.0 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.2 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 25.0 kB

  • Original 625.1 kB
  • After minification 600.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rdrct images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 15.3 kB

  • Original 106.9 kB
  • After minification 106.9 kB
  • After compression 91.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rdrct.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.3 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (52%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rdrct. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rdrct.cc

rdrct.cc

206 ms

www.affiliatespoint.com

www.affiliatespoint.com

172 ms

css

css

40 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

417 ms

style.css

style.css

129 ms

dark.css

dark.css

153 ms

app-landing.css

app-landing.css

150 ms

font-icons.css

font-icons.css

145 ms

et-line.css

et-line.css

124 ms

animate.css

animate.css

230 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

261 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

257 ms

bs-switches.css

bs-switches.css

266 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

261 ms

colors.css

colors.css

337 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

370 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

374 ms

functions.js

functions.js

378 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

217 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

325 ms

logo.png

logo.png

197 ms

link.jpg

link.jpg

196 ms

pixels.jpg

pixels.jpg

198 ms

redirects.jpg

redirects.jpg

305 ms

image_redirects.jpg

image_redirects.jpg

197 ms

bg.png

bg.png

459 ms

domains.jpg

domains.jpg

479 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

458 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

458 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

479 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

496 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

302 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

314 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

312 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

312 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

308 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

307 ms

Simple-Line-Icons.woff

Simple-Line-Icons.woff

294 ms

font-icons.woff

font-icons.woff

293 ms

logo-w.png

logo-w.png

196 ms

logo-w.png

logo-w.png

310 ms

collect

collect

116 ms

1054544021343744

1054544021343744

163 ms

Accessibility Review

rdrct.cc accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rdrct.cc best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rdrct.cc SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rdrct.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rdrct.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rdrct.cc

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rdrct. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: